.png)
UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT OF FUNCTION
Abstract
Concern has been expressed that many commencing undergraduate mathematics students have mastered skills without conceptual understanding. A pilot study carried out at a leading Australian university indicates that a significant number of students, with high tertiary entrance ranks, have very limited understanding of the concept of function, despite the emphasis it receives in the secondary mathematics curriculum. Whilst most students were familiar with families of functions, many were unable to give an appropriate definition or recognize whether a given graph or rule represents a function; and could not make correct connections between function graphs and tables of values.
Keywords: Algebra, Functions, Secondary School Mathematics, Undergraduate Mathematics
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blume, G. & Heckman, D. (1997). What do students know about algebra and functions? In P. Kenney
& E. Silver (Eds.), Results from the Sixth Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, pp. 225–277. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.
Bridger, M. & Bridger, M. (2001). Mapping diagrams: another view of functions. In A. Cuoco & F. R.
Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics, pp. 103–116. Reston, VA:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Carlson, M. P. (1998). A crossâ€sectional investigation of the development of the function concept.
Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, Conference Board of the Mathematical
Sciences, Issues in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 114–162.
Clement, L. (2001). What do students really know about functions? Mathematics Teacher, 94(9), 745–
Cooney, T. J. & Wilson, M. J. (1993). Teachers thinking about functions: Historical and research
perspectives. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema & T. P. Carpenter. Integrating research on the
graphical representation of functions (pp. 131–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.),
The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 153–174).
Kieran, C. (1993). Functions, graphing, and technology: Integrating research on learning and
instruction. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Ed.), Integrating research in the
graphical representation of functions, pp.189–237. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kieran, C. & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Computer algebra systems and algebra: Curriculum, assessment,
teaching, and learning. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching
and Learning of Algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 99-154). Norwood, MA: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: a brief survey. The College Mathematics
Journal, 20(4), 282–300.
Knuth, E. (2000). Understanding connections between equations and graphs, The Mathematics
Teacher, 93(1), January 2000, pp. 48–53.
Norman, A. (1992). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge of the concept of function. In E. Dubinsky &
G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, pp. 215–58.
Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
Oehrtman, M. C., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that
promote coherence in students’ understandings of function. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen
(Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics, pp. 150–
. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The
concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, pp. 22–58. Washington, DC: The
Mathematical Association of America.
Tall, D. & Bakar, N. (1991). Students’ mental prototypes for functions and graphs. In P. Boero & F.
Furinghetti (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 15, Assisi, Vol. 1, pp. 104–111. Assisi: Program
Committee of the 15th PME Conference.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A.
H. Schoenfeld, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 1 (Issues in
Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, pp. 21–44). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Vinner, S. & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356–366.
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics
education: A perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on
mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1495.85-107
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats