Delsika Pramata Sari, Darhim Darhim, Rizky Rosjanuardi


The purpose of this study was to investigate the errors experienced by students learning with REACT strategy and traditional learning in solving problems of mathematical representation ability. This study used quasi experimental pattern with static-group comparison design. The subjects of this study were 47 eighth grade students of junior high school in Bandung consisting of two samples. The instrument used was a test to measure students' mathematical representation ability. The reliability coefficient about the mathematical representation ability was 0.56. The most prominent errors of mathematical representation ability of students learning with REACT strategy and traditional learning, was on indicator that solving problem involving arithmetic symbols (symbolic representation). In addition, errors were also experienced by many students with traditional learning on the indicator of making the image of a real world situation to clarify the problem and facilitate its completion (visual representation).


Errors, REACT Strategy, Problems of Mathematical Representation Ability


Ashlock, R. B. (2002). Error Patterns in Computation: Using Error Patterns to Improve Instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

CORD. (1999). Teaching Mathematics Contextually: The Cornerstone of Tech Prep. Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.

CORD. (2012). The REACT Strategy. (Online), (, diakses 1 Februari 2017.

Farida, N. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro (Aksioma), 4 (2), 42-52. Solo: Aksioma.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (Seventh Edition). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26 (4), 683-710. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

Mudzakir, H. S. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Think Talk and Write untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematik Beragam Siswa SMP. Unpublished Dissertation. Bandung: Indonesia University of Education.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The Role of Representation (s) in Developing Mathematical Understanding. Theory into practice, 40 (2), 118-127. Ohio: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

Rokhimah, S., Suyitno, A, & Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2015). Students Error Analysis in Solving Math Word Problems of Social Arithmetic Material for 7th Grade Based on Newman Procedure. Proceeding in International Conference on Conservation for Better Life 2015, 349-356. Semarang: Semarang State University.

Sarwadi, H. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding Students’ Mathematical Errors and Misconceptions: The Case of Year 11 Repeating Students. Mathematics Education Trends and Research. (Online), (, diakses 1 Februari 2017.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal on Mathematics Education
Program S3 Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Indexed in: