### THE EFFECT OF BRAIN BASED LEARNING ON SECOND GRADE JUNIOR STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICS CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING ON POLYHEDRON

#### Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of Brain Based Learning on second grade junior high school students’ conceptual understanding on polyhedron. This study was conducted by using post-test only control group quasi-experimental design. The subjects of this study were 148 students that divided into three classes. Two classes were taken as sample by using cluster random sampling technique. One of the classes was randomly selected as an experimental group and the other as control group. There were 48 students in experimental group and 51 students in control group. The data were collected with post-test which contained mathematical conceptual understanding on fractions. The post-test consisted of 8 essay question types. The normality and variance homogeny test result showed that the scores are normally distributed and have no difference in variance. The data were analyzed by using one tailed t-test with significance level of 5%. The result of data analysis revealed that the value of t-test = 6,7096 greater than t-table = 1,987, therefore; the null hypothesis is rejected. There is positive effect of Brain-Based Learning on second grade junior students’ conceptual understanding in polyhedron.

#### Keywords

#### Full Text:

PDF#### References

Adegoke, B. A. & Ajadi, T. A. (2016). Stuctural modeling of teacher characteristic, skills in teaching, and students’achievment in secondary school physics, 6, 81–94. Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org

Candiasa, I. M. (2010). Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat Disertai Aplikasi SPSS. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Candiasa, I. M. (2011). Pengujian Instrumen Penelitian Disertai Aplikasi ITEMAN dan BIGSTEPS. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Coughlan, S. (2015). Asia Tops Biggest Global School Rankings. Retrieved December 17, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32608772

Dewi, N. . (2013). Peningkatan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Mahasiswa Melalui Brain-Based Learning Berbantuan Web, 1, 283–374.

Fitria, E. (2016). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Ipa-Biologi Menggunakan Model Brain Based Learning Menggunakan Peta Konsep Dengan Metode Diskusi Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 22 Surakarta.

Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis an Application. Unites States of Amerika: Merrill Publ?sh?ng Compeny.

Hidayat, R. & Iksan, H. Z. (2015). The Effect of Realistic Mathematic Education on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Linear Progamming, 6, 2439-2445.

Ignacio, N. G., Nieto, L. J. B., & Barona, E. G. (2006). The affective domain in mathematics learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics, 1, 16-32.

Jensen, E. (2008). Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak. Jakarta: Pusaka Pelajar.

Kastberg, D. dkk. (2016). Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science, Reading, and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context First Look at PISA 2015. United State of America. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2012/index.asp.

Kilpatrick, Swafford, dan F. (2001). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. (N. R. C. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9822.html

Mullis, E. al. (2011). TIMSS 2011: International Results in Mathematics. United States. TIMSS & PRILS International Study Center.

Mustiada, I. G. A. M. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Bbl (Brain Based Learning) Bermuatan Karakter Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA, 2.

NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standards for School Mathematic. Virginia.

Nur, I. R. D. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Brain Based Learning, 4, 26–41.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2012 Assessment and Annalytical Framework Mathematic, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2012-assessment-andanalytical-framework/mathematics-framework_9789264190511-3-en

OECD. (2014). PISA 2015 Result in Focus what 15-year-olds Know and what They Can Do with What They Know. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2015-results-overview.pdf

Provasnik, S. D. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS Advance 2015. Mathematics Framework., 1, 1–47.

Saravani, S., Marziyeh, A., & Jenaabadi, H. (2016). The relationship of dimention of perceived teaching style with studens’ mathematics achievement and self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics, 12, 349–358. Retrieved from http://www.ijme.com

Study)., T. (Trend in M. and S. (2011). Mathematics Framework, 1, 11–27.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wallen, F. &. (n.d.). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (eight). New York: Mc Graw Hill Companies.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5005.145-156

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.

**Journal on Mathematics Education**

Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar

Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar

Palembang - 30139

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats