• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • 55kbet
  • slot gacor
  • garudaslot
  • link slot gacor
  • COMPARISON OF CFD SIMULATION WITH 3 TURBULENCE MODELS FOR BREASTSHOT PICO HYDRO TURBINE | Adanta | Journal of Mechanical Science and Engineering

    COMPARISON OF CFD SIMULATION WITH 3 TURBULENCE MODELS FOR BREASTSHOT PICO HYDRO TURBINE

    Dendy Adanta

    Abstract


    The breastshot waterwheels are suitable for low head condition because it offers a stable efficiency compared to other types of turbine. In some cases, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was utilized to predict the performance, geometry optimization or physical phenomena of a breastshot waterwheel, CFD offers easiness in terms of energy, time and cost than doing experimental test. Turbulence modeling is a mathematical method to approach the evolution of turbulence. The aim of this study is to identify the suitable turbulence model for a breatshot waterwheel. These three turbulence models were utilized: k-? standard, k-? scalable near wall function and SST k-?. The braking preloads in simulation was varied, which were 75 N m, 150 Nm, 225 N m and 300 N m. Based on grid convergence index (GCI), the 123k elements of mesh and timestep size of 0.002 s were used and when compared to the exact value, an error below 2% was found. Moreover, the k-? scalable near wall function model and the turbulent SST k-? model give the similar result in torque. Therefore, the simulation test to find torque will be more efficient if using the standard k-? turbulent model because it has computational time which is lower than the turbulent SST k-? model. For the eddy viscosity and turbulence intensity contour k-? standard turbulent model and k-? near wall scalable gives no significant differences, but SST k-? model doe. The simulation test to find eddy viscosity and turbulence intensity contour will be more accurate if using SST k-? model, because this model has the mean rate-of-rotation tensor function, ? , and the blending functions, that makes SST k-? model have better accuracy on the near wall calculation.

    Keywords


    Picohydro, Breastshot, Waterwheel, Computational, Turbulence model

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    ESDM, “Rasio Elektrifikasi Indonesia,” 2017.

    P. Adhikari, U. Budhathoki, S. R. Timilsina, S. Manandhar, and T. R. Bajracharya, “A Study on Developing Pico Propeller Turbine for Low Head Micro Hydropower Plants in Nepal,” Journal of the Institute of Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–53, 2014.

    S. J. Williamson, B. H. Stark, and J. D. Booker, “Low Head Pico Hydro Turbine Selection Using a Multi-Criteria Analysis,” Renewable Energy, vol. 61, pp. 43–50, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.020.

    M. Gotoh, H. Kowata, T. Okuyama, and S. Katayama, “Damming-up Effect of a Current Water Wheel Set in a Rectangular Channel,” World Renewable Energy Congress VI, pp. 1615–1618, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1016/B978-008043865-8/50333-0.

    G. Muller and C. Wolter, “The Breastshot Waterwheel: Design and Model Tests,” ICE Proceedings-Engineering Sustainability, pp. 203–211, 2004.

    E. Quaranta and R. Revelli, “Optimization of Breastshot Water Wheels Performance Using Different Inflow Configurations,” Renewable Energy, vol. 97, pp. 243–251, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.078.

    E. Quaranta and R. Revelli, “Performance Characteristics, Power Losses and Mechanical Power Estimation for a Breastshot Water Wheel,” Energy, vol. 87, pp. 315–325, 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.079.

    E. Quaranta and R. Revelli, “CFD Simulations to Optimize the Blades Design of Water Wheels,” Drinking Water Engineering and Science Discussions, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.5194/dwes-2017-2.

    E. Quaranta and R. Revelli, “Hydraulic Behavior and Performance of Breastshot Water Wheels for Different Numbers of Blades,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 143, no. 1, p. 4016072, 2016.

    Warjito, D. Adanta, Budiarso, and A. P. Prakoso, “The Effect of Bucketnumber on Breastshot Waterwheel Performance,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, vol. 105, no. 1, p. 12031.

    Budiarso, Warjito, J. S. PPS, A. P. Prakoso, and D. Adanta, “Influence of Bucket Shape and Kinetic Energy on Breastshot Waterwheel Performance,” in 2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST), 2018, pp. 1–6.

    B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding, “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 269–289, 1974, doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2.

    ANSYS, “Turbulence,” in ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Teory Guide, 2009, pp. 2-1-4–46.

    F. R. Menter, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605, 1994.


    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.


    Indexing Journal JMSE :
    google scholar
    google scholar




    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



    Flag Counter



    View My Stats