Jurnal peternakan sriwijaya is a journal containing a collection of scientific articles, both from the results of research or reviews / literature reviews in the field of animal science, including:

  • livestock production
  • genetics and breeding
  • physiology and reproduction
  • nutrition and feeds science
  • feed processing technology
  • forage / agrostology,animal product
  • animal waste, biotecnology, animal behavior and welfare
  • health, environment / management of livestock waste, livestock farming system
  • socio-economic and polcy.




Checked ##manager.sections.open## Checked ##manager.sections.indexed## Checked ##manager.sections.reviewed##


The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office whether it is suitable with our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. This journal uses double-blind review, The manuscript will be sent to the reviewer anonymously. Reviewers' comment are also sent anonymously to corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. The decision of the revised manuscript will be then evaluated in editorial board meeting, based on the reviewer’s recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted. The Editor-in-Chief has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.



Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya is an open access journal that provides online publication twice a year (June and December) of articles in all areas of the subject in animal science and technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellences.



This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethics

Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya is a peer-reviewed journal. This journal follows guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)  facing all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers, and the publisher (Universitas Sriwijaya). Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya is dedicated to following best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions. The prevention of publication malpractice is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. Any kind of unethical behavior is not acceptable, and the journals do not tolerate plagiarism in any form.

Publication Decision

The editor of Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duty of Reviewers

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Duty of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


The Editors of Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in its publications. However, the  Editors of Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the Editors of Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya



Instruction to Authors

Manuscripts must be written whether in Bahasa Indonesia or in English. Authors make sure there are no typographical errors in the manuscript. Manuscripts must be typed in Microsoft Word 2007, using Times New Roman front at 12 points, 1,5 spaced in A4 size page with 3 cm margin on all sides. All lines and pages should be numbered consecutively.

The manuscript should be organized as follows:

Title Page: The title page should contain (i) a concise and informative full title, (ii) the name(s) of the author (s), (iii) the full postal address (es) of the institution(s) where the work was carried out, (iv) the name and E-mail of the corresponding author.

Abstract: This should not be more than 200 words, in a structured format, and its purpose is to summarize the main aims, results and conclusions in such a way that they could be understood by any interested reader and not only experts in the subject, and could be used by an abstracting journal. References to published or unpublished work and use of abbreviations should be avoided.

The structured abstract of a research article has four parts: the major objectives, methods, results, and conclusion. The abstract is followed by three to five keywords to be used for subject indexing.

Introduction: This should be as short as possible, and should simply serve to introduce the reader to the purpose and significance of the work described. It should neither be a mini-review nor should it be so bald as to be uninformative. When making general statements, reference should be made to recent reviews, and specific references should be cited only if they are particularly relevant.

Materials and Methods: This section must contain a clear description or specific original reference for all biological, analytical, and statistical procedures. All modification of the procedures must be explained clearly, so that the methods can be done by other scientist. Diets, animals (breed, sex, age, body weight), surgical techniques (if available), data measurements and statistical models should be described clearly. Information regarding the brand names, company names (manufacturer) and locations for all equipment and chemical (commercial products) used in the research, must be provided.

Results and Discussion: These should be confined to a factual account of the actual results obtained. Discussion and reference to other work should be left to the discussion.

Conclusion: Conclusion highlights the substantion of the results of the research and must be written shortly and concisely.

Acknowledgment: This gives an appreciation to institution or person who help in research and report writing and also describes the source of research fund use in the research.

References. References must be prepared according to Harvard style. All citations in the text should refer to:

  1. Single author: the author's name (without initials, unless there is ambiguity) and the year of publication;
  2. Two authors: both authors' names and the year of publication;
  3. Three or more authors: first author's name followed by 'et al.' and the year of publication.

Citations may be made directly (or parenthetically). Groups of references can be listed either first alphabetically, then chronologically, or vice versa.

examples: 'as demonstrated (Allan, 2000a, 2000b, 1999; Allan and Jones, 1999)…. Or, as demonstrated (Jones, 1999; Allan, 2000)… Kramer et al. (2010) have recently shown …'

List: References should be arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by the letters 'a', 'b', 'c', etc., placed after the year of publication.



Ali, A.I.M., Wassie, S.E., Korir D., Goopy, J.P., Merbold, L., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Dickhoefer U., Schlecht E. 2019. Digesta passage and nutrient digestibility in Boran steers at low feed intake levels. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 103, 1156 – 116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13158.

Chapter of a book

Schwab, C. G., Huhtanen, P., Hunt, C. W., Hvelplund, T. 2005. Nitrogen Requirements of Cattle. In E. Pfeffer & A. N. Hristov (Eds.), Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrition of Cattle (pp. 13-70). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

Presented paper

Schlecht, E., Sangaré, M., & Becker, K. 1995. Feed intake of Zebu cattle grazing Sahelian pasture in the dry and rainy season. Paper presented at the Sustainable Small-Scale Ruminant Production in Semi-Arid and Sub-Humid Tropical Areas, Stuttgart, Germany.


Otte, M. J., & Chilonda, P. 2002. Cattle and Small Ruminant Production Systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization.

Standard book

NRC. 1989. Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle. National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington D.C, USA.


Savadogo, M. 2000. Crop residue management in relation to sustainable land use. A case study in Burkina Faso. PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.


R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.

Website link:

Cancer Research UK. 2011. Cancer statistics reports for the UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/aboutcancer/statistics/cancerstatsreport/(accessed 13 March 2003).

FAO. 2018. Drought in the Horn of Africa : FAO in Emergencies. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. from www.fao.org/emergencies/crisis/drought-hoa/en/. (accessed 3 April 2018).

CIP. 2018. Sweetpotato in Africa. International Potato Centre. Lima, Peru. from https://cipotato.org/research/sweetpotato-in-africa/. (accessed 13 April 2018).


[dataset] Oguro, M., Imahiro, S., Saito, S., Nakashizuka, T., 2015. Mortality data for Japanese oak wilt disease and surrounding forest compositions. Mendeley Data, v1. https://doi.org/10.17632/xwj98nb39r.1.

References concerning unpublished data and "personal communications" should not be cited in the reference list but may be mentioned in the text.



Hasil gambar untuk gambar logo ms word