Students’ Literacy Quality in Bahasa Indonesia: Attitude, Interest, and Functional Reading
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this research was to find out the literacy quality of junior high school (JHS) students in Palembang. To achieve the goal, a survey on students’ reading literacy achievement in relation to their attitude towards and interest in reading bahasa Indonesia (BI) as National Language was conducted. To collect the data, the Functional Reading Achievement Test (FRAT) and the questionnaire of Attitude Towards and Interest in Reading Literacy (ATIReaL) were distributed to 191 students. Then to know about the perception of the stakeholders on literacy education, a set of Literacy Education Questionnaire (LEQ) was also filled in by 136 parents, 132 teachers, 31 principals, 32 librarians, and 44 superintendants. In addition, some representatives of the stakeholders were also interviewed to see what they have done and would like to do in terms of students’ literacy education enhancement. The results showed that (1) students’ functional reading achievement (FRA) is on average level, 57.20; (2) there are some aspects of ATIReaL correlated significantly with students’ FRA; and (3) most of the stakeholderss agree that literacy education of JHS students need to be developed and enhanced by having appropriate programs and facilities based on national standards of education.
Key words: bahasa Indonesia, functional reading, junior high school students, literacy education, reading attitude, reading interest
Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kwalitas literasi dari peserta didik Sekolah Menegah Pertama (SMP) di Palembang. Untuk menemukan jawabannya, dilakukan survey pada kemampuan literasi membaca para siswa yang berhubungan dengan sikap terhadap membaca dan minat mereka dalam Bahasa Indonesia sebagai bahasa nasional. Functional Reading Achievement Test (FRAT) dan angket Attitude Towards and Interest in Reading Literacy (ATIReaL) diberikan kepada 191 siswa. Kemudian, untuk mengetahui persepsi para pimpinan mengenai pendidikan literasi, angket Literacy Education Questionnaire (LEQ) diberikan kepada 136 wali murid, 132 guru, 31 kepala sekolah, 32 pustakawan, dan 44 pengawas. Wawancara juga dilakukan kepada perwakilan pimpinan untuk mengetahuai apa yang telah and akan mereka lakukan untuk meningkatkan pendidikan literasi peserta didik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahawa (1) pencapaian membaca fungsional para peserta didik berada pada tingkat menengah, 57.2; (2) ada beberapa aspek dari ATIReaL yang berhubungan secara signifikan terhdap FRA para peserta didik: (3) dan pada umumnya para pemimpin menyetujui bahwa pendidikan literasi siswa SMP perlu dikembangkan dan ditingkatkan melalui program dan fasilitas yang sesuai berdasarkan standar nasional pendidikan.
Kata-kata kunci: bahasa Indonesia, membaca fungsional, siswa SMP, pendidikan literasi, sikap baca, minat baca
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anhar, C. (2010). Peran pengawas sekolah
kurang optimal. Retrieved from http:// www.diknaspadang.org/mod.php?mod=publisher&op=viewarticle&cid=&artid=861
Broadband Commission (2012). The state of broadband 2012: Achieving digital inclusionfor all. www.broadbandcommis sion.org/Documents/bb-annualreport20 12.pdf
Cooper, J. D., Warncke, E. W., & Shipman, D. A. (1988). The what and how of reading instruction (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Diem, C. D. (2012). How the presence of a technologically supported library influences high school students’ reading habits and skills. Global Advanced Research Journal of Library and Archival Studies, 1(1), 001-005.
Diem, C. D., Yusfardiyah, Koniaturrohmah, B., & Lismalayani. (2016). Implementa-tion of school-based curriculum as perceived by secondary school teachers of English. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 167-175
Education First, English Proficiency Index. (2013). English proficiency index. Retrieved from http://www.ef.co.id/epi/
Fageeh, A. I. (2011). EFL learners’ use of blogging for developing writing skills and enhancing attitudes towards English learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 31-48.
Faizal, E. B. (2012, December 15). Few Indonesian science papers published in int’l journals. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakarta post.com/news/2012/12/15 /few-indonesi an-science-papers-published-int-l-journa ls.html
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. (2012/2013). Laporan kegiatan PLPG tahun 2012/2013. Palembang, South Sumatra: FKIP-Universitas Sriwijaya.
Fogarty, R. (1998). The intelligence-friendly classroom: It just makes sense. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(9), 655-657.
Follansbee, S., Hughes, B., Pisha, B., & Stahl, S. (1997, Winter). Can online communications improve student per-formance? Results of a controlled study. ERS Spectrum, pp. 15-26.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: Wiley and Computer Publishing.
Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English? London, England: The British Council.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L., Tailor, R., Bottge, B., & Daley, D. (1997). The computer doesn’t embarrass me. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 30-33.
Hien, P. D. (2010). A comparative study of research capabilities of East Asian countries and implications for Vietnam. Retrieved from http://chrd.edu.vn/site/ en/?p=1473
Hill, S. (2006-2008). Developing early literacy: Assessment and teaching. Prahran, VIC: Eleanor Curtain.
Hyland, T. (1998, Spring). Readers play catch up—and win. Technos Quarterly for Education and Technology and Teacher Education [online], 7(1), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.technos .net/journal/volume7/1hyland.htm
IEA (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu.
International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st century technologies. Retreived from httpp://w ww.reading.org/Libraries/positionstatements-and-resolutions/ps1067_NewLitera cies21stCentury.pdf -
Jun, F. U., & Pow, J. (2011). Fostering digital literacy through web-based learning: A case study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 10, 58-71.
Kachru, B. B. (1990). World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 3-20.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, Republik Indonesia. (2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). (School-based curriculum 2006). Jakarta, Indonesia: Puskurbuk.
Kurniawan, D. (2013). Teachers’ ICT qualification and ICT integration into ELT as perceived by teachers themselves and students’ English achievement in 10 state senior high schools in Palembang (Graduate thesis, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia).
Larson, L. C. (2009). Reader response meets new literacies: Empowering readers in online learning communities. The Reading Teacher, 62(8), 638 – 648.
Misselina. (2014). Pengaruh pendekatan refleksi pengalaman berbahasa (RPB) terhadap kemampuan literasi siswa SMK. LINGUA, 14(2), 144-155.
Mori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 1-17.
Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skill. Retrieved from www.oecd. org/edu/school /programmeforinternation alstudentassessmentpisa/33694881.pdf
OECD. (2006). PISA 2006 reading literacy framework. Retrieved from http://pisa .nutn.edu.tw/download/sample_papers/Reading_Framework-en.pdf
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.dx. doi.org/10.1787/8889323 43342
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Thomson, et al. (2011). Monitoring Australian year 4 student achievement internationally: TIMSS and PIRLS 2011.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 about Library. (2007). Retrieved from kepri.kemenag.go.id/file/file/UndangUndang/rayk1391497505.pdf?
Usoro, I. M. P., & Usanga, E. E. (2007). The role of Nigerian primary school libraries in literacy and lifelong learning: Library philosophy and practice. Retrieved from http://www.web pages.uidaho.edu/-mbolin.ima-eboro.htm
The Washington Post. (2014). Seven things that teachers are sick of hearing from school reformers. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/14/seventhings-teachers=are-sick-of-hearing-fromschool -reformers/
Wepner, S. B., & Ray, L. C. (2000). Using
technology for reading development. In S. B. Wepner, W. J. Valmont, & R. Thurlow (Eds.), Linking literacy and technology: A guide for K-8 classrooms (pp. 76-105). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Wilson, J., & Komba, S. C. (2012). The link between English language proficiency and academic performance: A pedagogical perspective in Tanzanian secondary schools. World Journal of English Language, 2(4), 1-10.
Ybarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ybarra-Technolo gy.html
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.