• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • santuy4d
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • https://perpustakaan.stpreinha.ac.id/mahasiswa/
  • https://www.lml.stpreinha.ac.id/lab/
  • https://cursosvirtuales.icip.edu.pe/nice/
  • slot resmi
  • Influence of Literature Circles Strategy and Cultural Literacy on Students’ English Achievement | Nariswari | LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

    Influence of Literature Circles Strategy and Cultural Literacy on Students’ English Achievement

    Bibie Nariswari, Chuzaimah D. Diem, Machdalena Vianty

    Abstract


    Abstract: This study investigated the influence of Literature Circles Stratey (LCS) and cultural literacy (CL) on 7th and 8th grade students’ English as a foreign language (EFL) achievement of one private junior high school in Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia. The students’ EFL achievement was measured by using English tests before and after the three-month intervention using LCS. The results of descriptive statistics showed that although based on paired sample t-test, the students’ EFL achievement increased significantly (mean difference =19.46; p<.000), it was still on below average level. Then, regression analysis also indicated that students’ EFL achievement was inluenced by their CL for 98.00% with reading has the highest percentage. The implication of these results should encourage the eagerness of the in-service teachers of English to apply the strategy appropriately and proportionally to enhance students’ all English skills and researchers to do similar study by involving students of all grade levels of both private and state public schools.

     

    Keywords: EFL learning, literature circles strategy, cultural literacy, junior high school students

     

    Abstrak: Penelitian ini meneliti pengaruh Strategi Lingkar Sastra (Literature Circles Strategy – LCS) dan Literasi Budaya (Cultural Literacy – CL) (LCS) pada kemampuan Bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing (EFL) pada siswa kelas 7 dan 8 di sebuah sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) swasta di kota Palembang, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia. Hasil kemampuan Bahasa Inggris sebagai Bahasa Asing (EFL) diukur dengan menggunakan test Bahasa Inggris sebelum dan sesudah intervensi selama 3 bulan menggunakan LCS.  Hasil dari gambaran statistika menunjukkan bahwa meskipun berdasarkan uji paired sample t-test, hasil kemampuan siswa meningkat secara signifikan (perbedaan nilai rata-rata =19.46; p<.000) masih di bawah angka rata-rata. Kemudian analisis regresi juga menunjukkan bahwa hasil kemampuan Bahasa Inggris sebagai bahwa asing masih dipengaruhi oleh Literasi Budaya 98% dengan presentase tertinggi dalam membaca. Implikasi dari hasil ini seharusnya mendorong kemauan para guru untuk mengaplikasikan strategi ini secara benar dan proporsional untuk meningkatkan semua keterampilan Bahasa Inggris, dan bagi peneliti agar dapat melakukan penelitian serupa dengan melibatkan siswa dari semua tingkat baik sekolah negeri maupun sekolah swasta.

     

    Kata-kata kunci: pembelajaran EFL, strategi lingkar sastra, keaksaraan budaya, siswa SMP


    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Undang-undang No. 20. (2003). National education system. Retrieved from http://www. Kemendikbud.go.id/main/tentang-kemendikbud/p roduk-hukum.

    Barns, B. (1998). Changing the classroom climates with literature circles. Journal of Adolecent & Adult Literacy, 42(2), 124-129. Retrieved from http: //www.jst or/stable/40016796

    British Council. (2013). The English effect. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil .org

    Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York, NY: Longman

    Constantin, E. C., Cohen-Vida, M. I., Popescu, A.V. (2015). Developing cultural awareness. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 191, 696-699.

    Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    DaLie, S. O. (2001). Students becoming real readers: Literature circles in high school English classes. In B.O. Ericson (Ed.), Teaching reading in high school English classes (pp. 84-100). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teacher of English.

    Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice & choice in the student-centered classroom. York, ME: Stenhouse publishers.

    Daniels, H. (2006). What’s the next big thing with literature circles? Voice from the Middle, 13(4). 10-15.

    Diem, C. D., & Atmanegara, Y. (2014). Cultivating children’s reading habit: Literacy learning enhancement in the digitization era. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 3(1&2), 1-11.

    Diem, C. D., & Pratiwi, L. (2016). Interaction effects of LCS and gender on tenth grader’s English achievement. 21st Century Academic Forum. 9(1). 26-37.

    Diem, C. D., Vianty, M., & Mirizon, S. (2016). Students’ specific comprehension skills in English based on locations, grades, and gender. Paper presented at the AARE International Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

    Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–135, doi.10.1017/S02614448 0001315X

    EF-English Proficiency Index. (2015). EF English proficiency index 2015. Retrieved from http://www.ef.edu/epi/ regions/asia/indonesia

    Elmayantie, C. (2015). The used of grammar translation method in teaching English. Journal on English as a foreign language, 5(2). Retrieved from http:// www.download.portalgaruda.org

    Fischer, C. (1999). An effective (affordable) intervention model for at-risk high school readers. Journal of Adolescents & Adult Literacy, 43, 326-335

    Gadd, C. (2011). Finally taking the plunge: Literature Circles. The Utah English Journal, 38(4), 52-56, Retrieved from http://www.ucte.info/new/wp_content/uploads/2011/04/LitCircles.pdf.

    Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N.B. (2016). Learner’s listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English language teaching, 9(6). doi. 105539/elt.v9n6p123

    Hirsch, E. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    iRubric. (2016). Grading criteria for English speaking test. Retrieved from http: www.rcampus.com/ rubricshowc. cfm?sp=true&code=L47B46

    Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. New York. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Krasher, I. (1999). The role of culture in language teaching. Dialogue on Language Instruction, 13(1-2), 79-88. Retrieved from http://www.dliflc.edu/w pcontent/uploads /2014/04/DLI_v13.pdf

    Laudner, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara Social Humaniora, 12(1), 9-20. Retrieved from http://www. repository.ui.ak.ac.id

    Meyer, A., & Schendel, R. K. (2014). Capitalizing on social and transactional learning to challenge first-grade reader. Reading Horizon, 53(4), 24-44. Retrieved from:http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/readinghorizons

    Keputusan Menteri No. 23/2006. Standar kompetensi lulusan untuk satuan dasar dan menengah. Retrieved from http:// www.kemendikbud.go.id/main/tentangkemendikbud/ produk-hukum.

    Keputusan Menteri No. 65 Tahun 2013. Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum SMP/MTs. Retrieved from www. kemendikbud.go.id/main/tentang-kemendikbud/ produk-hukum.

    NCREL. (2016). Cultural literacy rubric. Retrieved from: https://course1.winona. edu/shatfield/air/Cultural Literacy Rubric. pdf

    Nakamura, K. (2002). Cultivating global literacy through English as international language (EIL) education in Japan. A new paradigm for global education. International Education Journal, 3(5), 64-74. Retrieved from http://www.fli nders.edu.au/education/iej

    Naqeeb, H. (2012). Promoting cultural litearcy in the EFL classroom. Global Advanced Research Journal of Educational Research and Review, 1(4), 41-46. Retrieved from http://garj.org/g arjen/index.html

    OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from: www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts /46619703

    OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 result in focus. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org /pisa/keyfinding/pisa-2012-results overview.pdf

    OECD. (2016). Reading performance PISA indicator. doi. 10.1787/7991e 69-en https://data.oecd.org/pisa/readingperformance-pisa.htm.

    OECD. (2016). PISA result 2015 in focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf

    Peterson, E. Coltrane, B. (2003). Culture in second language teaching. Eric Clearing House on Language and Linguistics. Retrieved from www. cal.org/ERICCLL

    Pishghadam, R., & Navari, S. (2009). Cultural literacy in language learning: enrichment or derichment. Paper presented st the International Conference on Language. UPALS ICL.

    Richard, J. C. (2006). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Tobin, M. T. (2012). Digital storytelling: Reinventing literature circles. Voice from the Middle, 20(2). 40-48. Retrieved from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_facarticles1

    Tompkins, G. E. (2009). Literacy strategies: Step by step (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson

    Tuan, N. H., & Mai, T. N. (2015), Factors affecting students’ speaking performance at Le Thanh Hien high school. Asian Journal of Education Research, 3(2). Retrieved from http:// www.multidiscip linary journals.com

    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.