• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • 55kbet
  • slot gacor
  • garudaslot
  • link slot gacor
    • More than Teach: English Teachers’ Advocacy in the Online Globalized Era | Puspita Sari | LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

    More than Teach: English Teachers’ Advocacy in the Online Globalized Era

    Artanti Puspita Sari

    Abstract


    Abstract: This paper reviews how language educators and researchers have responded to issues in the online era, such as globalization, transnational migration, and global challenges.  Online technology has triggered increasing globalization of businesses and has become a powerful means of communication for individuals in establishing and developing relationships across national boundaries. Furthermore, it has served to raise awareness of social, economic, and environmental challenges of the 21st century.  In spite of its positive effects, online technology development results in a more demanding world which requires individuals to enhance their competitive ability. Improving the quality of education is paramount in strengthening the quality of human resources.  Based on the review of language educators’ and researchers’ responses toward issues in the online era, the writer considers what English educators, particularly those in Indonesia, can do to advocate the enhancement of education quality through their roles as teachers, researchers, and community members.

     

    Keywords: globalization, language educators, online technology

     

    Abstrak: Makalah ini mengulas bagaimana para pendidik dan peneliti bahasa telah menanggapi isu-isu di era online, seperti globalisasi, migrasi transnasional, dan tantangan global. Teknologi dalam jaringan (online) telah memicu meningkatnya globalisasi bisnis dan telah menjadi sarana komunikasi yang penting bagi masyarakat dunia dalam membangun dan mengembangkan hubungan lintas batas negara. Selain itu, teknologi online telah meningkatkan kesadaran akan tantangan sosial, ekonomi, dan lingkungan abad ke-21. Terlepas dari efek positifnya, pengembangan teknologi online menuntut sumber daya manusia untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kompetitif mereka. Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan sangat penting dalam memperkuat kualitas sumber daya manusia. Berdasarkan tinjauan terhadap reaksi para pendidik bahasa dan peneliti terhadap isu-isu di era online, penulis memberikan rekomendasi mengenai apa yang dapat dilakukan oleh para pendidik bahasa Inggris, khususnya yang ada di Indonesia, untuk mengadvokasi peningkatan kualitas pendidikan melalui peran mereka sebagai guru, peneliti, dan anggota masyarakat.

    Kata-kata kunci: globalisasi, tenaga pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, teknologi dalam jaringan

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society, 7, 295-310.

    Block, D. (2013). Globalization and language teaching. In N. Coupland (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization (pp. 287-304). West Sussex, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Bolton, K. (2012). World Englishes and Asian Englishes: A survey of the field. In A. Kirkpatrick and R. Sussex (Eds.), English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education (Multilingual Education) (pp. 13-26). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

    Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Translingual Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

    Channel NewsAsia. (2018, November 19). Why it Matters. Ep.2: Taking the right turn? [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/video-on-demand/why-it-matters/taking-the-right-turn-10909742?cid=facebook

    Christiansen, S. M.(2015). ‘A ondi queras’: Ranchero identity construction by U.S. born Mexicans on Facebook. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(5), 688-702.

    Christiansen, M. S. (2017). Creating a unique transnational place: Deterritorialized discourse and the blending of time and space in online Social Media. Written Communication, 34(2) 135-164.

    Daniel, M.C., Schumacher, G., Stelter, N., & Riley, C. (2016). Student perception of online learning in ESL bilingual teacher preparation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3) 561-569.

    Gallo, S. L. (2013). Mexican immigrant fathers and their children: An inves-tigation of communicative resources across contexts of learning (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pen-nsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).

    Garcia, O., & Wei, Li. (2014). Translang-uaging: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Gillen, J., & Kucirkova, N. (2018). Percolating spaces: Creative ways of using digital technologies to connect young children's school and home lives. British Journal of Educational Ecology, 49(5), 834-846.

    Kachru, B. B. (1986). The power and politics of English. World Englishes, 5, 121-140.

    Kilkki, K., Mantyla, M., Karhu, K., Hammainen, H., & Ailisto, H. (2018). A disruption framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 129, 275-284.

    Kinloch, V. (2018). Necessary disruptions: Examining justice, engagement, and humanizing approaches to teaching and teacher education. Teaching Works Working Papers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Lam, W. S. E. (2009). Multiliteracies on

    instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4) 377-397.

    Lindahl, K. (2017). Five ELT trends to watch in 2017. TESOL International Association. Retrieved from http://blog .tesol.org/five-elt-trends-to-watch-in2017

    Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Crafting love: Letters and cassette tapes in transnational Filipino family com-munication. South East Asia Research, 19(2) 249-272.

    Ministry of Education and Culture. (2015). Panduan pelaksanaan program penel-itian tindakan kelas tingkat satuan pendidikan tahun 2015. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Education and Culture Research and Development Agency Center of Policy Research.

    Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132-141.

    Nedelcu, M., & Wyss, M. (2016). ‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: transnational commu-nication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks, 16(2), 202-218.

    Pratama, H., & Yuliati. (2016). Global education in English classroom: Integrating global issues into English language teaching. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(9), 719-722.

    Richards, J. C., & Rodgers. T. S. (2016). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Shelton, L. (2007). Importing Canagara-jah's global Englishes. English Teach-ing: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 58-71.

    Stevenson, N. (2003). Cultural citizenship in the 'cultural' society: A cosmopolitan approach. Citizenship Studies, 7(3), 331-348.

    The Government of Indonesia. (2005). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 14 tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta, Indonesia: Secretary of State Office.

    Wei, L. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 1-23.

    World Economic Forum. (2016). World economic forum annual meeting 2016 mastering the fourth industrial revolu-tion. Cologny, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Yi, Y. (2009). Adolescent literacy and identity construction among 1.5 generation students from a transnational perspective. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(1), 100-129.

    Yi, Y. (2008). Voluntary writing in heritage language: A study of biliterate Korean-heritage adolescents in the U.S. The Heritage Language Journal, 6(2), 72-93.


    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.