TEACHER’S TALKS IN CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT BANI ADUNG ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL BANTEN
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to find out the categories and students’ perceptions of teacher’s talks that were applied by the English teacher in the teaching and learning process at Bani Adung Islamic Boarding School based on the framework Flander’s Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC), and to know the students’ perceptions about the teacher’s talks. The participants of this research were the English teacher and the eighth grade students of the setting. The method of this research was qualitative descriptive method, and observation sheet, audio recording and questionnaire were used for data collection. The data taken from the teacher’s talks applied by the teacher in classroom activities were analyzed qualitatively. The result showed that the most dominant category was giving directions (29%), followed by asking the questions (27.5%), and the last category was accepting or using ideas of students (2.9%). The indirect talks were lower than direct talks. As a result, the teacher-centered method was found to be the most prevalent during classroom interaction. Students also preferred to be praised or encouraged, and effective language in the classroom was required. It is recommended that the teacher use all types of teacher talks in the classroom. They should, however, be based on the needs of the students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adediwura, A. (2007). Perception of teacher knowledge, attitude, and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(7). 165- 171.
Al-Otaibi, S. S. H. (2004). The effect of positive teacher talk on students’ performance, interaction, and attitude: A case study of female students at the College of Language and Translation at King Saud University.
Amatari, V. O. (2015). The instructional process: A review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting. International Journal of Secondary Education , 43-49.
Bawa, N. & Suleiman, Z. (2015). Constructivism and classroom interaction. International Journal of modern social science, 4 (2), 71-81.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed). San Fransisco: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principle: An integrative approach to language pedagogy. Pearson: Longman.
Choudron, C. (1998). Second language classroom: Research on teaching and learning. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Cook, V. (2000). Second language learning and language teaching (2nd ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Creswell. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, evaluating qualitative and quantitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education International.
Croker, R., & Heigham, J. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. NY : Palgrave Macmillan.
Dagarin, M. (2004). Classroom interaction and communication strategies in learning English as foreign. Ljubljana: ELOPE.
Darmadi, H. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan dan sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Elliott, R. (1999). Editor’s introduction to special issue on qualitative psychotherapy research: Definitions, themes and discoveries. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 251–257.
Ellis, R. (1994). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enzmann, D., & Schaufeli, W. (1998). the burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis. UK : Taylor & Francis.
Farrell, S., (2016). open-ended vs. close-ended question in user Research. Nielsen Norman Group.
Flick, U., Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design an evaluate research in education (7th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Frenchlting, J., & Sharp, L. (1997). User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluation. NY : NSF Program Officer Conrad Katzenmeyer.
Gauthier, S. & Rockwood, K. (2005). Trial design and outcomes in dementia therapeutic research. NY: Taylor and Francis.
Given. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. In: Lisa, M. (Eds). California: Sage-Thousand Oaks.
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2007). An introduction to qualitative research. East Minlands: National institute for health research.
Hanum, N. S. (2017). The importance of classroom interaction in the teaching of reading in junior high school. Prosiding seminar nasional mahasiswa kerjasama direktorat jenderal guru dan tenaga kependidikan kemendikbud 2016, 2, 309-318.
Harmer, J. (2001). How to teach English (2nd ed.). England: Longman.
Inayah, N. (2012). A descriptive analysis of students’ perception toward a conversational class taught by foreigner counterpart in the first year students of SMA Muhammadiyah (Plus) Salatiga in academic year of 2011/2012. Research Paper. State Institute of Islamic Studies (STAIN) Salatiga.
Irons, A. (2007). Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback. NY : Routledge.
Julana, N. A. (2018). The Patterns of Classroom Interaction in English Speaking Course. Research Paper. Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Darussalam - Banda Aceh.
Kabir, S. M. J. (2016). Method of data collection. Bangladesh. Book Zone Publication.
Karuniasih, J. M. (2019). An analysis of teacher’s talk in classroom interaction at SMPN 5 Kota Serang in academic year 2018-2019. Research paper. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten.
Mahmud, M., & Sofyan , R. R. (2014). Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction: A Study at an English Department in Indonesia. Research Paper. English Language Education Graduate Program State University of Makassar.
Masturah, N. (2016). Analysis of teacher’s talk in an English classroom (A descriptive study at SMAN Fajar Harapan, Banda Aceh). Research paper. Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. California: SAGE Publication Inc.
Nugrahaeni, J. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward teacher’s talk in English classroom. Research paper. The State Islamic Institute of Surakarta.
Putri, F. G. (2014). An analysis of classroom interaction by using Flander interaction analysis categories system (FIACS) technique at SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu in 2013/ 2014 academic year. Research Paper. University of Bengkulu.
Rasyid, M. A., & Hafsah J. N. (1997). Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: Theory, practice, and research. FBS IKIP Ujung Pandang.
Seliger, H. (1989). Second language research method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidhu, G. K. (2003). Literature in language classroom: Seeing through the eyes of learners. In Ganakumaran & Edwin, M. (Ed). Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL content (pp. 88-110). Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi-Melta ELT Series.
Suherdi. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A systematic approach. Bandung: Celtics Press.
Tavakoli, H. (2012). A dictionary of research methodology and statistic in applied linguistics. Iran: Rahnama Press.
Unumeri, G. O. (2009). Perception and Conflict. Nigeria.
Walgito, B. (2003). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Yan, X. (2006). Teacher talk and EFL in University Classroom. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved November 27, 2019 from www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis_Ma_Xiaou.pdf.
Yanfen, L., & Yuqin, Z. (2010). A study of teacher talk in interactions in English classes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 76-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v8i1.13400
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
PUBLISHER:
ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM, FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION, UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA
JLN SRIJAYA NEGARA BUKIT BESAR PALEMBANG 30137, SUMATERA SELATAN, INDONESIA
EMAIL: jele@fkip.unsri.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.