• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • santuy4d
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • https://perpustakaan.stpreinha.ac.id/mahasiswa/
  • https://www.lml.stpreinha.ac.id/lab/
  • https://cursosvirtuales.icip.edu.pe/nice/
  • slot resmi
    • IMPROVING READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 2 PALEMBANG BY USING ONLINE MIND MAPPING | Maris | The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language

    IMPROVING READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 2 PALEMBANG BY USING ONLINE MIND MAPPING

    Rani Inke Maris, Chuzaimah Dahlan Diem

    Abstract


    The objectives of this study were to find out (1) whether or not there was a significant improvement in reading comprehension achievement of the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Palembang after they were taught by using online mind mapping, and (2) whether or not there was contribution of each sub-skill of reading comprehension to reading comprehension achievement of the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Palembang.  In this study, Time Series design was applied. The sample of this study was 40 tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Palembang, who belong to the experimental group. To collect the data, the experimental group was given a pretest and a post test. The result showed that (1). the mean difference between pre-test and post-test of the experimental group was 34.70 at the significance level of p value <0.05. Since t obtained was higher than t table (18.2111>2.023), H01 was rejected and there was a significant improvement in reading comprehension achievement after they were taught by using online mind mapping, (2).The highest contribution of reading sub-skill was given by sequence (39.4%) and then it was followed by vocabulary (23.3%), detail (17.3%), main idea (9.1%), inference (5.6%) and cause and effect (5.2%).

    Keywords: reading comprehension, online mind mapping


    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Astuti, E. M. (2010). English zone for senior high school students year X. Jakarta, Indonesia: Erlangga.

    Biktimirov, E., & Nilson, L. B. (2007). Adding animation and interactivity to finance courses with learning objects. Journal of Financial Education, 33, 37-49.

    Boyson, G. (2009). The use of mind mapping in teaching and learning: The learning institute assignment 3. Retrieved from http://mind-mapping-evidence-report.com.

    Coffman, G. A., & Reed, M., D. (2010). The true story of narrative text: From theory to practice. The Reading professor, 32(1),6-7.Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book. New York, NY:Dutton.

    Diem, C.D. (2011). 3-Ls: A model for teaching young learners. TEFLIN, 22(2), 125-145.

    Davies, M. (2010). Concept mapping, mind mapping, and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?. Springer Science Bussiness, (6), 19-20.

    DePorter, Bobbi, & Hernacki., M. (2008). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kaifa

    Duffy, P., & Bruns, A. (2006, November 2). The use of blogs, wikis, and RSS in education: A conversation of possibilities. Paper presented in Online Learning and Teaching Conference 2006, Brisbane, Queensland. Retrieved fromwww.eprints.qut.edu.au/5398/

    Goodnough, K., & Woods, R. (2002, 1-5 April). Student and teacher perception of mind mapping: A middle school case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of America Educational Research Association , New Orleans. Retrieved from http://www.mind-mapping-evidence-report.com.

    Kaufman, J. (2010). 3 sample techniques to optimize your reading comprehension and retention. Retrieved from http://personalmba.com/3-simple-techniques-to-optimize-your-reading-comprehension-and-retention/#ixzz0hj7mdly2.

    Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2011). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 49(3), 193-194.

    Indah. (2010). Teaching vocabulary through mind mapping technique. Retrieved from jlt-polinema.org/?p=321.

    Jacobs, V., A. (2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 21.

    Linse, C., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young learners (PELT). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9901946-practical-english-language-teaching.

    Madya, S. (2007). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Retrieved from http://www.sacareerfocus.co.24/.

    Mickulecky, B.S., & Feffries.L. (2003). Reading Power: Reading for pleasure, comprehesnion skills, reading faster. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Mislaini. (2015). Improving students’ reading comprehension of narrative text by using fable at the grade X of SMAN 1 Bonai Darussalam.(Published undergraduate’s thesis), Pasir Pengaraian Univeristy, Indonesia.

    Mueller, A., Johnston, M., & Bligh, D. (2002). Joining mind mapping and care planning to enhance students’ critical thinking and achieve holistic nursing. Nursing Diagnosis, (13)1, 24.

    Murley, D. (2008). Teaching for every age: Mind mapping as a complex information. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9901946-practical-english-language-teaching.

    Ningtyas, U. K. (2012). Enhancing reading comprehension of the eighth grade students’ of SMP Negeri 7 Palembang by using digital mind mapping. (Unpublished undergraduate’s thesis), Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia.

    Novianty, M. (2015). The effectiveness of concept mapping, venn diagrams, and critical thinking on reading comprehension achivement of the eleventh grade students of SMA Bina Warga 2 Palembang. (Unpublished master’s thesis) Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia.

    Nutt, A. (2010). Learning English using technology. Retrieved from http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Amy_Nutt.OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.

    PIRLS. (2011).2011 international result in reading. Retrieved from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/PRTZ)!/PRTZ)!Ch1.pdf.

    Prado, L., & Plourde, L. A. (2011). Increasing reading comprehension through the explicit teaching of reading strategies: Is there any difference among the genders?, 48(1), 32.

    Priyatno, D. (2008). Mandiri belajar SPSS untuk analisis data dan uji statistik. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.

    Reidel, J., Thomaszweski, T., & Weaver, D. (2003). Improving students academic reading achievement through the use of multiple intellegence teaching strategies.Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/1b/47/2f.pdf.

    Smith, R. (2007). Learning how to learn. Milton Keyner: Open University Press.

    Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Pittsburgh, PA: RAND.

    Sudarwati, T., & Grace, E. (2007). Look ahead an English course 3. Jakarta, Indonesia: Erlangga.

    Swalm, J., & Kling, M. (2000). Speed in reading in the elemantary school. The Elementary Journal, 74(3), 158-164.

    Trelease, J. (2001). Reading for fun is reading for the future. Retrived from http://www.Trelease-on-reading.com/rah.htmlYlvisaker, M. (2006). Tutorial reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.projectlearnet.org/tutorial/reading_comprehesnion.html.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v6i1.9989

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.


    License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

    PUBLISHER:

    ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM, FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION, UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA                       

    JLN SRIJAYA NEGARA BUKIT BESAR PALEMBANG 30137, SUMATERA SELATAN, INDONESIA

    EMAIL: jele@fkip.unsri.ac.id

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

     VIEW