UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT OF FUNCTION

Caroline Bardini, Robyn Pierce, Jill Vincent, Deborah King

Abstract


Concern has been expressed that many commencing undergraduate mathematics students have mastered skills without conceptual understanding. A pilot study carried out at a leading Australian university indicates that a significant number of students, with high tertiary entrance ranks, have very limited understanding of the concept of function, despite the emphasis it receives in the secondary mathematics curriculum. Whilst most students were familiar with families of functions, many were unable to give an appropriate definition or recognize whether a given graph or rule represents a function; and could not make correct connections between function graphs and tables of values.

Keywords: Algebra, Functions, Secondary School Mathematics, Undergraduate Mathematics


Full Text:

PDF

References


Blume, G. & Heckman, D. (1997). What do students know about algebra and functions? In P. Kenney

& E. Silver (Eds.), Results from the Sixth Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment

of Educational Progress, pp. 225–277. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of

Mathematics.

Bridger, M. & Bridger, M. (2001). Mapping diagrams: another view of functions. In A. Cuoco & F. R.

Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics, pp. 103–116. Reston, VA:

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Carlson, M. P. (1998). A crossâ€sectional investigation of the development of the function concept.

Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, Conference Board of the Mathematical

Sciences, Issues in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 114–162.

Clement, L. (2001). What do students really know about functions? Mathematics Teacher, 94(9), 745–

Cooney, T. J. & Wilson, M. J. (1993). Teachers thinking about functions: Historical and research

perspectives. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema & T. P. Carpenter. Integrating research on the

graphical representation of functions (pp. 131–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.),

The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 153–174).

Kieran, C. (1993). Functions, graphing, and technology: Integrating research on learning and

instruction. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Ed.), Integrating research in the

graphical representation of functions, pp.189–237. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kieran, C. & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Computer algebra systems and algebra: Curriculum, assessment,

teaching, and learning. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching

and Learning of Algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 99-154). Norwood, MA: Kluwer Academic

Publishers.

Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: a brief survey. The College Mathematics

Journal, 20(4), 282–300.

Knuth, E. (2000). Understanding connections between equations and graphs, The Mathematics

Teacher, 93(1), January 2000, pp. 48–53.

Norman, A. (1992). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge of the concept of function. In E. Dubinsky &

G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, pp. 215–58.

Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Oehrtman, M. C., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that

promote coherence in students’ understandings of function. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen

(Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics, pp. 150–

. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The

concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, pp. 22–58. Washington, DC: The

Mathematical Association of America.

Tall, D. & Bakar, N. (1991). Students’ mental prototypes for functions and graphs. In P. Boero & F.

Furinghetti (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 15, Assisi, Vol. 1, pp. 104–111. Assisi: Program

Committee of the 15th PME Conference.

Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A.

H. Schoenfeld, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 1 (Issues in

Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, pp. 21–44). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Vinner, S. & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356–366.

Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics

education: A perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on

mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1495.85-107

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
email: jme@unsri.ac.id
p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

Creative Commons License
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View My Stats