Students' Information Literacy: A Perspective from Mathematical Literacy

Ariyadi Wijaya

Abstract


Information literacy is mostly seen from the perspective of library science or information and communication technology. Taking another point of view, this study was aimed to explore students' information literacy from the perspective of mathematical literacy. For this purpose, a test addressing Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) mathematics tasks were administered to 381 eighth and ninth graders from nine junior high schools in the Province of Yogyakarta. PISA mathematics tasks which were used in this test had specific characteristics regarding information processing, i.e. containing superfluous information, having missing information, and requiring connection across information sources. An error analysis was performed to analyze students’ incorrect responses. The result of this study shows that students did not acquire three characteristics of information literacy; i.e. recognizing information needs, locating and evaluating the quality of information, and making effective and ethical use of information. This result indicates students' low ability in information literacy.

Keywords: information literacy, mathematical literacy, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)


Full Text:

PDF

References


American Library Association. (1989). Final Report of the Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Chicago: American Library Association.

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and competencies for new millennium in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 41. OECD Publishing.

Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (15–30). New York: Springer.

Campbell, S. (2004). Defining information literacy in the 21st century. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 70th IFLA General Conference and Council, IFLA, Buenos Aires, Argentine Republic.

Catts, R., & Lau, J. (2008). Towards information literacy indicators.

Cummins, D.D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405-438.

Katz, I.R. (2007). Testing Information Literacy in Digital Environments: ETS's iSkills Assessment. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(3), 3-12.

Kong, S. C., & Li, K. M. (2009). Collaboration between school ansssd parents to foster information literacy: learning in the information society. Computers & Education, 52(2), 275–282.

Kurbanoglu, S., Akkoyunlu, B., & Umay, A. (2006). Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 730-743.

Lai, H.-J. (2011). Information Literacy Training in Public Libraries: A Case from Canada. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 81–88.

Maass, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(2), 113–142.

McGuinness, C. (2006). What Faculty Think— Exploring the Barriers to Information Literacy Development in Undergraduate Education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 573–574.

OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework - Mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. Paris: Author.

Owusu-Ansah, E. K. (2003). Information literacy and the academic library: a critical look at a concept and the controversies surrounding it. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(4), 219-230.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st century. A report and mile guide for 21st century skills. Tucson, AZ: Author.

Rader, H. B. (2002). Information literacy 1973-2002: A selected literature review. Library trends 51(2), 242-259.

Usluel, Y. K. (2007). Can ICT usage make a difference on student teachers' information literacy self-efficacy? Library and Information Science Research, 29, 92−102.

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Verschaffel, L., Dooren, W. V., Greer, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Reconceptualising word problems as exercises in mathematical modelling. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(1), 9-29.

Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3532.73-82

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Journal on Mathematics Education
Program S3(Doktor) Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
email: jme@unsri.ac.id

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats