Zakaria Ndemo


Intending to improve the teaching and learning of the notion of mathematical proof this study seeks to uncover the kinds of flaws in postgraduate mathematics education student teachers. Twenty-three student teachers responded to a proof task involving the concepts of transposition and multiplication of matrices. Analytic induction strategy that drew ideas from the literature on evaluating students’ proof understanding and Yang and Lin’s model of proof comprehension applied to informants’ written responses to detect the kinds of flaws in postgraduates’ proof attempts. The study revealed that the use of empirical verifications was dominant and in situations. Whereby participants attempted to argue using arbitrary mathematical objects, the cases considered did not represent the most general case. Flawed conceptualizations uncovered by this study can contribute to efforts directed towards fostering strong subject content command among school mathematics teachers.


mathematical proof; transpose and multiplication of matrices; flawed conceptualisations; levels of proof comprehension

Full Text:



Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R.C.I., Kenedi, A.K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2018). The instruments of higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012053.

Azarello, F. (2007). The proof in the 20th century: From Hilbert to automatic theorem proving. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in schools: From history, epistemology, and cognition to classroom practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Berg, B.L. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences Topics. Boston: Allyn Brown.

Bieda, K.N. (2010). Enacting proof-related in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351-382.

Bleiler, S.K., Thompson, D.R., & Kraj?evski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9248-1.

Brown, J., & Stillman, G. (2009). Preservice teachers’ competencies in proof. In F.-L Lin, F-J., Hsieh, G. Hanna, M. de Villiers (Eds), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: Vol. 2. (pp.196-201). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University.

Conradie, J., & Frith, J. (2000). Comprehension tests in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017502919000.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Curd, M. (1992). Arguments and Analysis: An Introduction to philosophy. London: West Publishing.

Dahlberg, R.P., & Housman, D.L. (1997). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002999415887.

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.

Flick, W. (2011). Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing a Research Project. London: Sage Publications.

Garret, L. (2013). Flawed mathematical conceptualizations: Marlon’s dilemma. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(2), 2-4, 6-8.

Goodaire, E.D. (2014). Linear Algebra: Pure and Applied. Toh Tuck: World Scientific Publishing.

Hanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2008). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge. ZDM, 40(3), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0080-5.

Harel, G., and Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp 805-842). Charlotte, NC: Information Publishing.

Harel, G., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2006). Advanced mathematical thinking: Some PME perspectives. In A. Gutierrez and P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Post, Present and Future. Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 147-172.

Jahnke, H.N. (2007). Proofs and hypotheses. ZDM, 39(1-2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0006-z.

Jonassen, D.H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8.

Jones, K. (1997). Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21-32.

Lee, K., & Smith, P. (2009). Cognitive and linguistic challenges in understanding proving. In F-L. Lin, F-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference on Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: Vol. 2. (pp. 15-21). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

Lesseig, K. (2016). Investigating mathematical knowledge for teaching proof in professional development. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 253-270.

Lipschutz, S. (1991). Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Linear Algebra. New York: McGraw-Hall.

Mamona-Downs, J., & Downs, M. (2013). Problem solving and its elements in forming proof. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 137-162.

Martin, G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41-51.

Maya, R., & Sumarmo, U. (2011). Mathematical understanding and proving abilities: experiment with undergraduate student by using modified Moore learning approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 231-250. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.751.231-250.

Mejia-Ramos, J.P., & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F-L. Lin, F-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference on Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: Vol. 1. (pp. 88-93). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

Mejia-Ramos, J.P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9514-2.

Mejia-Ramos, J.P., Fuller, E., Weber, K., Rhoads, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9349-7.

Morselli, F. (2006). Use of examples in conjecturing and proving: An exploratory study. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Ed), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol. 4. (pp. 185-192). Prague: PME.

Mumu, J., Prahmana, R.C.I., & Tanujaya, B. (2018). Construction and reconstruction concept in mathematics instruction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012011.

Ndemo, Z., Zindi, F., & Mtetwa, D. (2017). Mathematics Undergraduate Student Teachers' Conceptions of Guided Inductive and Deductive Teaching Approaches. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(2), 75-83.

Noto, M.S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J.A. (2019). Mathematical proof: The learning obstacles of preservice mathematics teachers on transformation geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5379.117-126.

Prahmana, R.C.I., & Suwasti, P. (2014). Local instruction theory on division in mathematics GASING. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.1.1445.17-26.

Punch, K.F. (2005). Introduction to Social Science Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.

Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi. (2018). Higher-order thinking skill problem on data representation in primary school: A case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012056.

Saleh, M., Prahmana, R.C.I., Isa, M., & Murni. (2018). Improving the reasoning ability of elementary school student through the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54.

Selden, J., & Selden, A. (2009). Understanding the proof construction process. In F.-L Lin, F-J . Hsieh, G. Hanna, M. de Villiers (Eds), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: Vol. 2. (pp.196-201). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University.

Shahrill, M., Putri, R.I.I., Zulkardi, & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Processes involved in solving mathematical problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1952(1), 020019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031981.

Stylianides, A.J. (2011). Towards a comprehensive knowledge package for teaching proof: A focus on the misconception that empirical arguments are proofs. Pythagoras, 32(1), 1-10.

Stylianides, A.J., & Stylianides, G.J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9191-3.

Stylianou, D., Blanton, M.L., & Rotou, O. (2015). Undergraduate students’ understanding of proof: Relationships between proof conceptions, beliefs, and classroom experiences. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 91-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0003-0.

Varghese, T. (2009). Secondary-level teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1-13.

Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J.P. (2014). Mathematics majors’ beliefs about proof reading. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 45(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.790514.

Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J.P. (2015). On relative and absolute conviction in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(2), 3-18.

Yang, K., & Lin, F.L. (2008). A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9080-6.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7864.379-396


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
email: jme@unsri.ac.id

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats