USING ROBOTICS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN INQUIRIES TO OPTIMIZE MATHEMATICS LEARNING FOR MIDDLE LEVEL TEACHERS: A CASE STUDY

Iman Chafik Chahine, Norman Robinson, Kimbeni Mansion

Abstract


This exploratory case study reports findings on 20 middle-level science and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of a one-year project in which teachers engaged in using robotics and engineering design inquiries in their classrooms. Principled by Bandura’s Social Learning Theory (SLT) and using mixed methods approaches, the study measured teachers' efficacy through the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (MTEBI) and observation logs before and after the program. The results of this study showed statistically significant differences between PRE MTEBI and POST MTEBI scores. Furthermore, five themes emerged that illuminated potential affordances and constraints that teachers perceive as opportunities and barriers to employing robotics and design thinking in the mathematics/science classrooms. The reported themes are creating collaborative spaces underpinned by design thinking affords transformative learning; problem-solving through shared inquiry elevates confidence; building connections between mathematical concepts and real-life phenomenon supports a willingness to learn new ideas; system support, resources, and funding are prerequisites to engage in modeling design; and designated curriculum restrains teachers from engaging in extra activities that focus on design thinking.


Keywords


Modelling; Robotics; Design thinking; Teaching efficacy; Problem solving

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: An interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-6.

Bergman, D. J., & Morphew, J. (2015). Effects of a science content course on elementary preservice teachers' self-efficacy of teaching science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 73-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631942.

Bonghanoy, G. B., Sagpang, A. P., Alejan Jr, R. A., & Rellon, L. R. (2019). Transformative professional development for mathematics teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.6882.289-302.

Borman, G., Rozek, C., Pyne, J., & Hanselman, P. (2019). Reappraising academic and social adversity improves middle school students’ academic achievement, behavior, and well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(33), 16286-16291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820317116.

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering, 70(6), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011- 090606.55.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Virginia: National Science Teachers Association.

Chung, C. C., Cartwright, C., & Cole, M. (2014). Assessing the impact of an autonomous robotics competition for STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 15(2), 24-34.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: LEA.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Evans, D., Borriello, G. A., & Field, A. P. (2018). A review of the academic and psychological impact of the transition to secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01482.

Gaur, A. S., & Gaur, S. S. (2009). Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS. Thousand Oaks: Response Books.

Georgia Alliance of Education Agency Heads, Math/Science Task Force. (2008). Proposal for Georgia Alliance Math/Science Task Force: Differentiated pay. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.usg.edu/educational_access/documents/item2_pay.pdf.

Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Southerland, S. A., Saka, Y., & Ke, F. (2019). Examining features of how professional development and enactment of educative curricula influences elementary science teacher learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 348-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21480.

Hendriana, H., Johanto, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The role of problem based learning to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5394.291-300.

Hughes, J. N., Im, M. H., & Allee, P. J. (2015). Effect of school belonging trajectories in grades 6-8 on achievement: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.08.001.

Malone, M., Cornell, D. G., & Shukla, K. (2019). Grade configuration is associated with school-level standardized test pass rates for sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1654526.

Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7.

Pajares, M. F. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307.

Robinson, N. (2016). A case study exploring the effects of using an integrative STEM curriculum on eighth-grade students' performance and engagement in the mathematics classroom. Doctoral Dissertation. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.

Ryang, D. (2010). The development of the mathematics teaching self-efficacy scales for Korean elementary and secondary preservice teachers. Doctoral Dissertation. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama.

Saldaña, J. (2012). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.

Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals' cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Solomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 111-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saxton, E., Burns, R., Holveck, S., Kelley, S., Prince, D. Rigelman, N. & Skinner, E. (2014). A common measurement system for K-12 STEM education: Adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.005.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202.

Voelkel Jr, R. H., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1299015.

Wijsman, L.A., Warrens, M.J., & Saab, N. (2016). Declining trends in student performance in lower secondary education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0277-2.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11099.319-332

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
email: jme@unsri.ac.id

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats