Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono, Sugi Hartono, Ahmad Wachidul Kohar


The emerging of formal mathematical proof is an essential component in advanced undergraduate mathematics courses. Several colleges have transformed mathematics courses by facilitating undergraduate students to understand formal mathematical language and axiomatic structure. Nevertheless, college students face difficulties when they transition to proof construction in mathematics courses. Therefore, this descriptive-explorative study explores prospective teachers' mathematical proof in the second semester of their studies. There were 240 pre-service mathematics teachers at a state university in Surabaya, Indonesia, determined using the conventional method. Their responses were analyzed using a combination of Miyazaki and Moore methods. This method classified reasoning types (i.e., deductive and inductive) and types of difficulties experienced during the proving. The results conveyed that 62.5% of prospective teachers tended to prefer deductive reasoning, while the rest used inductive reasoning. Only 15.83% of the responses were identified as correct answers, while the other answers included errors on a proof construction. Another result portrayed that most prospective teachers (27.5%) experienced difficulties in using definitions for constructing proofs. This study suggested that the analytical framework of the Miyazaki-Moore method can be employed as a tool to help teachers identify students' proof reasoning types and difficulties in constructing the mathematical proof.


deductive-inductive reasoning; proving difficulties; mathematical proof; prospective teachers

Full Text:



Almeida, D. (2000). A survey of mathematics undergraduates' interaction with proof: some implications for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 869-890.

Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2008). Deductive reasoning: in the eye of the beholder. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 235-247.

Baki, A. (2008). Mathematics education from theory to practice. Ankara: Harf Educational Publications

Balacheff, N. (2010). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and Proof in Mathematics––Philosophical and Educational Perspectives (vol. 45, pp. 115-135). New York: Springer.

Blanton, M. L., Stylianou, D. A., & David, M. M. (2003). The nature of scaffolding in undergraduate students’ transition to mathematical proof. In N. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the International Group for Psychology in Mathematics Education (vol. II, pp. 113-120). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Buchbinder, O., & McCrone, S. (2020). Preservice teachers learning to teach proof through classroom implementation: Successes and challenges. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100779.

Carrillo-yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-medrano, E., Escudero-ávila, D., ... & ribeiro, M. (2018). The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236-253.

Chin, E., & Lin, F. (2009). A comparative study on junior high school students’ proof conceptions in algebra between Taiwan and the UK. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 52-67.

Clark, M., & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestion for a theoretical model for secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 25–37.

Christou, C., & Papageorgiou, E. (2007). A framework of mathematics inductive reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 55-66.

De Villiers, M. D. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17-24.

Demiray, E., & Bostan, M. I. (2017). An investigation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ ability to conduct valid proofs, methods used, and reasons for invalid arguments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 109-130.

Dickerson, D. S., & Pitman, D. J. (2016). An examination of college mathematics majors’ understandings of their own written definitions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 1-9.

Edwards, B. S., & Ward, M. B. (2004). Surprises from mathematics education research: Student (mis) use of mathematical definitions. The American Mathematical Monthly, 111(5), 411- 424.

Epp, S. S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 110(10), 886-899.

Hanna, G., De villiers, M., Arzarello, F., Dreyfus, T., Durand- Guerrier, V., Jahnke, N.H., (...) Yevdokimov, O. (2009). ICMI Study 19: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Discussion Document). In Lin, Fou-Lai (Eds.). Proceeding of The ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (vol.1). Taipei: The Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University

Jones, K. (1997). Student-teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21–32.

Kögce, D., Aydin, M. & Yildiz, C. (2010). The views of high school student about proof and their levels of proof (the case of Trabzon). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2544-2549.

Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 61-88.

Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.

Lee, H. S. (2002). Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy sets and systems, 132(3), 303-315.

Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41–51.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Miyazaki, M. (2000). Levels of proof in lower secondary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 47-68.

Moore, R.C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249-266

Moral?, S., U?urel, I., Türnüklü, E. B. ve Ye?ildere, S. (2006). Matematik ö?retmen adaylar?n?n ispat yapmaya yönelik görü?leri. Kastamonu E?itim Dergisi, 14(1), 147-160.

Morris, A. K. (2002). Mathematical reasoning: Adults' ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 79-118.

Morselli, F. (2006). Use of examples in conjecturing and proving: An exploratory study. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 185.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Ndemo, Z. (2019). Flaws in Proof Constructions of Postgraduate Mathematics Education Student Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 379-396.

Ozdemir, E., & Ovez, F. T. D. (2012). A research on proof perceptions and attitudes towards proof and proving: Some implications for elementary mathematics prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2121-2125.

Özer, Ö., & Arõkan, A. (2002). Students’ levels of doing proof in high school mathematics classes. Paper presented at the meeting of 5th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress (pp. 1083-1089). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2007). Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning to understand and construct proofs (Report No. 2007-1). Cookeville: Mathematics Department, Tennesse Technological University.

Selden, J., Benkhalti, A., & Selden, A. (2014). An analysis of transition-to-proof course students’ proof constructions with a view towards course redesign. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 246-259).

Shaker, H., & Berger, M. (2016). Students’ difficulties with definitions in the context of proofs in elementary set theory. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), 80-90.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3-31.

Smith, J. C. (2006). A sense-making approach to proof: Strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(1), 73-90.

Stavrou, S. G. (2014). Common Errors and Misconceptions in Mathematical Proving by Education Undergraduates. In the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1-8

Steele, M. D., & Rogers, K. C. (2012). Relationships between mathematical knowledge for teaching and teaching practice: The case of proof. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(2), 159-180.

Stylianides, A. J. (2007). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 1-20.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats