Kadir Kadir, Lucyana Lucyana, Gusni Satriawati


This study aims to reveal the improvement of the students’ learning activities, responses, and mathematical creative thinking skills (MCTS) through open- inquiry approach (OIA). Other relevant studies in mathematics learning tend to focus on guided inquiry, and especially in Indonesia, OIA is still less applied. This study is conducted at State Junior High School in Indonesia. The method used in this study is Classroom Action Research (CAR) consists of four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Data is collected through observation, journal reviews, interview, and test. The result of the study shows that the implementation of OIA enhances the students’ MCTS. It is shown by the improvement of the average of students’ score from 73.05 in the first cycle to 78.95 in the second cycle. The increasing of MCTS includes some aspects: fluency, flexibility, and originality. The result also shows that in general, the students give positive response and engage well in learning activities with OIA. It can be concluded that the implementation of OIA enhances learning activities, gives positive response towards mathematics, and improves students’ creative thinking skills.

Keywords: Open-Inquiry Approach, Learning Activity, Response, Creative Thinking Skill



Full Text:



Altricher, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2005). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the method of action research. New York: Routledge.

Basrowi, H.M., & Suwandi. (2008). Prosedur Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.

Costello, P.J. (2011). Effective action research: Developing reflective thinking and practices (2nd ed). London: Continum.

Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, 42-53. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi. (2016). Open-ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9-18.

Gulo, W. (2008). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Jarret, D. (1997). Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Mills, G.E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Boston: Pearsin.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C: National Academic Press.

Nishitani, I. (2011). Mathematical Creativity and Disposition: Experiment with Grade-10 Students using Silver Inquiry Approach. University School of Gunma. Bulletin Part of Natural Science Education, 59, 1-16.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results In Focus, (

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided?. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 831-848.

Saini, R.A. (2015). Inovasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Silver, E.A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75-80.

Sumarmo, U. (2014). Kumpulan makalah berpikir dan disposisi matematik serta pembelajarannya. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Zion, M. & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

Creative Commons License
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats