• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • 55kbet
  • slot gacor
  • garudaslot
  • link slot gacor
    • CREATING MANIPULATIVES: IMPROVING STUDENTS' CREATIVITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING | Ummah | Journal on Mathematics Education

    CREATING MANIPULATIVES: IMPROVING STUDENTS' CREATIVITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

    Siti Khoiruli Ummah, Akhsanul In’am, Rizal Dian Azmi

    Abstract


    The purpose of this study is describing the implementation of project-based learning model and analysing the student’s creativity improvement in the subject of learning media. We describe the implementation of project-based learning based on our note of the learning syntax during one semester. Then, compared the students’ product to measure their creativity improvement in the aspects of originality, novelty, and flexibility. This study used descriptive-qualitative method and involved the students who took the learning media course as its subjects. The results showed that there was an improvement of the students’ creativity in the project-based learning implementation. The improvement was measured in the making of the manipulatives. The students’ flexibility and novelty were good, while their originality was fair.

    Keywords


    Creativity; Mathematics manipulatives; Project-based learning

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Adams, K. (2005). The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. New York: National Center on Education and The Economy.

    Ali, R., Akhter, A., Shahzad, S., Sultana, N., & Ramzan, M. (2011). The impact of motivation on students’ academic achievement in problem based learning environment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 306-309.

    Bolden, D. S. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 245-265.

    Burlbaw, L. (2013). STEM Project Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Capraro, R., & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

    Cope, L. (2015). Math Manipulatives: Making The Abstract Tangible. Delta Journal of Education, 5(1), 10-19.

    Coyne, J., Hollas, T., & Potter, J. P. (2016). Jumping in: Redefining teaching and learning in physical education through project-based learning. Strategies, 29(1), 43-46.

    Crowley, B. M. (2015). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Mathematics Achievement of Elementary Students Across Time. Thesis. Bowling Green: Western Kentucky University.

    Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American psychologist, 14(8), 469.

    Hidayah, I., Dwijanto, & Istiandaru, A. (2018). Manipulatives and Question Series for Elementary School Mathematics Teaching on Solid Geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 649-662.

    Jacques, L. A. (2017). What does Project-based Learning (PBL) look like in the mathematics classroom? American Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 428-433.

    Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215-234.

    Liu, Y. (2010). A case study of online project-based learning: The beer king project. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 43-57.

    Ozel, S. (2014). Effectiveness of an Online Manipulative Tool and Students’ Technology Acceptances. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1), 1-15.

    Roberts, J. (2011). Jazzed about Javits—GEMS data showing impact on student learning in math and science. Proceeding of the NAGC 58th Annual Convention. New Orleans, LA: National Association for Gifted Children.

    Sousa, F. C. (2012). Creativity, Innovation and Collaborative Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(1), 1-39.

    Sulisworo, D., & Permprayoon, K. (2018). What is the Better Social Media for Mathematics Learning? A Case Study at A Rural School in Yogyakarta Indonesia. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 39-48.

    Tienken, C. H. (2010). Common Core State Standards: I Wonder? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(1), 14-17.

    Torrance, E. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexinton: Personnel Press/Ginn and Company.

    Yazgan-Sag, G., & Emre-Akdo?an. (2016). Creativity from Two Perspectives: Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Mathematician. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(12), 25-40.

    Yulistiyarini, H., & Mahmudi, A. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran materi geometri ruang SMP dengan memanfaatkan alat peraga manipulatif dan lingkungan. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 155-167.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.




    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats