.png)
CREATING MANIPULATIVES: IMPROVING STUDENTS' CREATIVITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, K. (2005). The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. New York: National Center on Education and The Economy.
Ali, R., Akhter, A., Shahzad, S., Sultana, N., & Ramzan, M. (2011). The impact of motivation on students’ academic achievement in problem based learning environment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 306-309.
Bolden, D. S. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 245-265.
Burlbaw, L. (2013). STEM Project Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Capraro, R., & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Cope, L. (2015). Math Manipulatives: Making The Abstract Tangible. Delta Journal of Education, 5(1), 10-19.
Coyne, J., Hollas, T., & Potter, J. P. (2016). Jumping in: Redefining teaching and learning in physical education through project-based learning. Strategies, 29(1), 43-46.
Crowley, B. M. (2015). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Mathematics Achievement of Elementary Students Across Time. Thesis. Bowling Green: Western Kentucky University.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American psychologist, 14(8), 469.
Hidayah, I., Dwijanto, & Istiandaru, A. (2018). Manipulatives and Question Series for Elementary School Mathematics Teaching on Solid Geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 649-662.
Jacques, L. A. (2017). What does Project-based Learning (PBL) look like in the mathematics classroom? American Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 428-433.
Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215-234.
Liu, Y. (2010). A case study of online project-based learning: The beer king project. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 43-57.
Ozel, S. (2014). Effectiveness of an Online Manipulative Tool and Students’ Technology Acceptances. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1), 1-15.
Roberts, J. (2011). Jazzed about Javits—GEMS data showing impact on student learning in math and science. Proceeding of the NAGC 58th Annual Convention. New Orleans, LA: National Association for Gifted Children.
Sousa, F. C. (2012). Creativity, Innovation and Collaborative Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(1), 1-39.
Sulisworo, D., & Permprayoon, K. (2018). What is the Better Social Media for Mathematics Learning? A Case Study at A Rural School in Yogyakarta Indonesia. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 39-48.
Tienken, C. H. (2010). Common Core State Standards: I Wonder? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(1), 14-17.
Torrance, E. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexinton: Personnel Press/Ginn and Company.
Yazgan-Sag, G., & Emre-Akdo?an. (2016). Creativity from Two Perspectives: Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Mathematician. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(12), 25-40.
Yulistiyarini, H., & Mahmudi, A. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran materi geometri ruang SMP dengan memanfaatkan alat peraga manipulatif dan lingkungan. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 155-167.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats