SAILING CONTEXT IN PISA-LIKE MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahamad, S.N.S.H., Li, H.C., Shahrill, M., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Implementation of problem-based learning in geometry lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012008.
Bairac, R. (2005). Some methods for composing mathematical problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1(3), 1-7. Retrieved from: http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/bairac.pdf.
Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-7834-1.
Clair, J.S. (2018) Using cartoons to make connections and enrich mathematics. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary STEM Teaching and Learning Conference (vol. 2, article 12). Georgia: Georgia Southern University. https://doi.org/10.20429/stem.2018.020112.
Efriani, A., Putri, R.I.I., & Hapizah. (2018). PISA like mathematics problem: a case of soccer context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012108. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012108.
Fajriyah, M., Putri, R.I.I., Zulkardi. (2017). Dayung context in fraction. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (vol. 100). Banjarmasin: Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/seadric-17.2017.1.
Gunawan, M.S., Putri, R.I.I., Zulkardi. (2017). Learning fractions through swimming context for elementary school students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (vol. 100). Banjarmasin: Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/seadric-17.2017.14.
Hapizah. (2014). Developing the instruments of students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the course of differential equations [in Bahasa]. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v5i1.3280.
Hapizah. (2016). Student's ability to solve problem-solving problems in mathematics [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 23(2), 124-131.
Hasratuddin. (2010). Improving the critical thinking skills of junior high school students through realistic mathematics approach [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.4.2.317.
Hendroanto, A., van Galen, F., van Eerde, D., Prahmana, R.C.I., Setyawan, F., & Istiandaru, A. (2018). Photography activities for developing students’ spatial orientation and spatial visualization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012029. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012029.
INASGOC. (2018). Asian Games 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.asiangames2018.id.
Jannah, R.D., Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi. (2018). PISA-like mathematics problem: The context of basketball in Asian Games. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012019. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012019.
Lutfianto, M., Zulkardi & Hartono, Y. (2013). Unfinished student answer in PISA mathematics contextual problem. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.552.188-193.
NCTM. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nizar, H., Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi. (2018). Developing PISA-like mathematics problem using the 2018 Asian Games football and table tennis context. Journal in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5246.183-194.
OECD. (2015). Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD.
Prahmana, R.C.I., & Suwasti, P. (2014). Local instruction theory on division in Mathematics GASING: The case of rural area’s student in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.1.1445.17-26.
Prahmana, R.C.I., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Learning multiplication using Indonesian traditional game in third grade. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.3.2.1931.115-132.
Pulungan, D.A. (2014). Developing the instrument of PISA model mathematical literacy test [in Bahasa]. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2). 74-78.
Putri, R.I.I. (2015). The interaction effect of learning approach in the formative test form of the mathematics learning outcomes [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 22(1), 69-75.
Rahayu, C., Putri. R.I.I., Zulkardi. (2017). Multiplication of fraction with natural number by using hurdles. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (vol. 100). Banjarmasin: Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/seadric-17.2017.10.
Roni, A., Zulkardi, Putri, R.I.I. (2017). Learning divisions of fractions through sprint running pictures. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4) 381-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.5982.
Sapitri, S., & Hartono, H. (2015). The effectiveness of STAD and GI cooperative learning in terms of critical thinking skills and mathematical communication [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7346.
Saragih, S., & Rahmiyana. (2013). Increasing mathematical communication skills of senior high school / MA students in Simpang Ulim District through the STAD type cooperative learning model [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 19(2), 174-188.
Sasongko, T.P.M. (2016). Developing of a package of PISA model space content and shape to determine the mathematics literacy of junior high school students [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Edukasi, 3(1), 27-32.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126.
Stacey, K. (2012). The international assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education Programme. Seoul: COEX.
Sturgeon, A. (2018). Why literacy should be included in an effective elementary math curriculum. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76957.
Sudarman. (2010). Thinking process of junior high school students based on Adversity Quotient (AQ) in solving mathematical problems [in Bahasa]. Unpublished Dissertation. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Sukirwan, Darhim, Herman, T., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). The students’ mathematical argumentation in geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012026.
Sulastri, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, R. (2014). The ability of mathematics education department students at FKIP Unsyiah to solve the PISA questions in most difficult level [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Didaktik Matematik, 1(2), 13-21.
Tessemer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Widiati, I. (2015). Developing mathematical representation ability of junior high school students through contextual learning [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(2), 106-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.571.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students' errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584. Available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol11/iss3/8.
Zulkardi. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers. Dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
Zulkardi. (2010). PISA, KTSP and UN. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV, 53-54. Manado: UNIMA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5245.265-276
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats