• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • santuy4d
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • https://perpustakaan.stpreinha.ac.id/mahasiswa/
  • https://www.lml.stpreinha.ac.id/lab/
  • https://cursosvirtuales.icip.edu.pe/nice/
  • slot resmi
    • DEVELOPING FLIPBOOK MULTIMEDIA: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF INFORMAL DEDUCTIVE THINKING LEVEL | Andini | Journal on Mathematics Education

    DEVELOPING FLIPBOOK MULTIMEDIA: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF INFORMAL DEDUCTIVE THINKING LEVEL

    Swastika Andini, Budiyono Budiyono, Laila Fitriana

    Abstract


    The geometry in flipbook multimedia can improve the necessary skills of the 6th graders, so that achieve the highest level of geometric thinking that is informal deductive. The flipbook which uses technology with flipping experience, animation, video, and music is different than the ordinary printed book. Also, it looks more exciting and interactive for students. The aim of this research measures flipbook effectiveness on limited-scale and wide-scale tryout, it is reviewed from Skill Gist Competence domain (KI-4) of Curriculum 2013 on geometry primary skill indicator, also examining flipbook efficacy if it is compared with the printed book which has been used before. The instrument used on a limited-scale tryout and wide-scale tryout is a rubric assessment of product-based and performance-based. However, the tool used on the efficacy test is an achievement test which consists of twenty questions of multiple choice. The test material in the achievement test is about quadrilateral and problem-solving. Based on statistic analysis result on the efficacy test, the research result shows that student’s capability who uses flipbook is better than the student who doesn’t, in learning geometry. Furthermore, the conclusion is that flipbook multimedia is more efficacy than before product.

    Keywords


    geometry; informal deductive; van hiele; curriculum 2013; flipbook

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Abdullah, A.H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van hiele's phases of learning geometry on students’ degree of acquisition of van hiele levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251-266.

    Abu, M.S., Ali, M.B., & Hock, T.T. (2012). Assisting primary school children to progress through their van hiele's levels of geometry thinking using google sketchUp. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 75-84.

    Adolphus, T. (2011). Problems of teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(2), 143-152.

    Ahamad, S.N.S.H., Li, H.C., Shahrill, M., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Implementation of problem-based learning in geometry lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012008.

    Andini, S., Fitriana, L, Budiyono. (2018). Geometry in flipbook multimedia: A technology role in improve mathematical learning quality in Madiun. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1008(1), 012077.

    Arsyad, A. (2011). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

    Budiyono. (2017). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS Press.

    Crowley, M.L. (1987). The van hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12, 1-16.

    Cumaoglu, G., Sacici, E., & Torun, K. (2013). E-book versus printed materials: Preference of University Student. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4 (2), 121-135.

    Erdo?an, T., & Durmu?, S. (2009). The effect of the instruction based on van hiele model on the geometrical thinking levels of preservice elementary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 154-159.

    Genlott, A.A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps–Improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99, 68-80.

    Haviger, J., & Vojk?vková, I. (2015). The van hiele levels at Czech secondary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 912-918.

    Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics teacher, 74(1), 11-18.

    Isiksal, M., & Askar, P. (2005). The effect of spreadsheet and dynamic geometry software on the achievement and self-efficacy of 7th-grade students. Educational Research, 47(3), 333-350.

    Jupri, A. (2017). Investigating primary school mathematics teachers’ deductive reasoning ability through varignon’s theorem. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 895(1), 012080.

    Ma, H.L., Lee, D.C., Lin, S.H., & Wu, D.B. (2015). A study of van hiele of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th graders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1181-1196.

    Olkun, S., Altun, A., & Smith, G. (2005). Computers and 2D geometric learning of Turkish fourth and fifth graders. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 317-326.

    Prahmana, R.C.I., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Learning multiplication using indonesian traditional game in third grade. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115-132.

    Purwanto, N. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

    Rofii, A., Sunardi, & Irvan, M. (2018). Characteristics of students’ metacognition process at informal deduction thinking level in geometry problems. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 89-104.

    Sariyasa. (2017). Creating dynamic learning environment to enhance students’ engagement in learning geometry. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 824(1), 012057.

    Sutiarso, S., Coesamin, M., & Nurhanurawati. (2018). The effect of various media scaffolding on increasing understanding of student’s geometry concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 95-102

    Y?ld?z, C., Ayd?n, M., & Kö?ce, D. (2009). Comparing the old and new 6th-8th grade mathematics curricula in terms of van hiele understanding levels for geometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 731-736.

    Zulkifli. (2013). Model of learning information and communication technology based; Study of learning islamic educational senior high school Kendari. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 3(1), 24-27.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5396.227-238

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.




    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats