• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • santuy4d
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • https://perpustakaan.stpreinha.ac.id/mahasiswa/
  • https://www.lml.stpreinha.ac.id/lab/
  • https://cursosvirtuales.icip.edu.pe/nice/
  • slot resmi
    • THE INTEGRATION OF A PROBLEM-SOLVING FRAMEWORK FOR BRUNEI HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM IN INCREASING STUDENT’S AFFECTIVE COMPETENCY | Chong | Journal on Mathematics Education

    THE INTEGRATION OF A PROBLEM-SOLVING FRAMEWORK FOR BRUNEI HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM IN INCREASING STUDENT’S AFFECTIVE COMPETENCY

    Maureen Siew Fang Chong, Masitah Shahrill, Hui-Chuan Li

    Abstract


    A mathematics framework was developed to integrate problem-solving that incorporated simulation of real-life problems in the classrooms. The framework coined as the RECCE-MODEL emphasised understanding and thinking with a view on mathematics embedded in real-life. The RECCE which stands for Realistic, Educational, Contextual, Cognitive, and Evaluation encompass the underlying principles of teaching problem solving and guide teachers in planning, designing, developing, and facilitating real-life activity tasks in developing students’ problem-solving competencies in mathematics lessons. It also explores students’ cognitive competency in their application of abstract mathematical knowledge into real-life problems based on students’ developmental status of their thinking and reasoning skills correlating to Meanings, Organise, Develop, Execute and Link (MODEL). This study investigated the affective development of the students through activity tasks developed by the sampled teachers using the principles within the framework. In total, 94 students from two high schools in Brunei Darussalam responded to a students’ questionnaire constructed to address the MODEL aspect of the framework. In particular, the analyses involved the students’ affective competencies that corresponded to a 19-item instrument within the questionnaire.  The findings showed that Brunei high school students have stimulated beliefs and positive attitudes towards non-routine problem-solving in the learning of mathematics. Meanwhile, meaningful activities developed by the teachers encouraged the development of cognitive-metacognitive and affective competencies of the students. The RECCE-MODEL framework paved the way towards understanding the relationships between effective pedagogical approaches and students’ learning, and between attitudes and cognitive abilities, and also for teachers to make better-informed decisions in the delivery of the curriculum.

    Keywords


    Mathematics Framework; Problem Solving; Curriculum; Affective Competencies

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Allen, B. (2010). The primary mathematics specialists – What do they think about teaching and learning mathematics? In M. Joubert & P. Andrews (Eds.), Proceedings of the British Congress for Mathematics Education April 2010 (pp. 9-16).

    Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147-164.

    Ausubel, D.P. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Barbosa, J.C. (2012). Mathematical modelling in classroom: A socio-critical and discursive perspective. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652812.

    Blomhøj, M. (2008). Different perspectives on mathematical modelling in educational research-Categorising the TSG21 papers. In ICME 11 International Congress on Mathematics Education (pp. 1-13).

    Blum, W., & LeiB, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Chaines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.): Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, ICTMA 12 (pp. 222-231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.

    Carlson, M.P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x.

    Chong, M.S.F. & Shahrill, M. (2015). An exploratory study of Brunei Darussalam pre-university students’ affective mathematical modeling competencies. In C. Vistro-Yu (Ed.), In Pursuit of Quality Mathematics Education for All: Proceedings of the 7th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 417-423). Quezon City: Philippine Council of Mathematics Teacher Educators (MATHTED) Inc.

    Chong, M.S.F., & Shahrill, M. (2016). The use of an emerging framework to explore students’ cognitive competency. Indian Journal of Science Technology, 9(16), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2016%2Fv9i16%2F78812.

    Chong, M.S.F., Shahrill, M., Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi (2018). Teaching problem solving using non-routine tasks. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1952(1), 020020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031982.

    Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th Ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Ernest, P. (1988). The problem solving approach to mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 7(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/7.2.82.

    Garofalo, J., & Lester Jr, F.K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748391.

    Goos, M., Vale, C., & Stillman, G. (2017). Teaching secondary school mathematics: Research and practice for the 21st century (2nd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Kenedi, A.K., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., Helsa, Y., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical connection of elementary school student to solve mathematical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5416.69-80.

    Khoo, J.S., Shahrill, M., Yusof, N., Chua, G.L.L., & Roslan, R. (2016). Graphic organizer in action: Solving secondary mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3546.83-90.

    Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 763-804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Lester, F.K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. (1989). The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: A study of two grade seven classes. Final report to the National Science Foundation of NSF project MDR 85-50346. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314255.pdf

    McLeod, D.B. (1989). The role of affect in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod, & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 20-36). New York, NY: Springer.

    McLeod, D.B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 575-596). New York, USA: MacMillan.

    Ministry of Education. (2013). Sistem Pendidikan Negara Abad ke-21 SPN21 (Revised Ed.). Ministry of Education, Brunei Darussalam.

    Novak, J.D. (2013a). Empowering learners and educators. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 4(1), 14-24.

    Novak, J.D. (2013b). Meaningful learning is the foundation for creativity. Qurriculum: Revista de teoría, investigación y práctica educative (Revista Curriculum), (26), 27-38.

    Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Reys, R.E., Suydam, M.N., & Lindquist, M.M. (1992). Helping children learn mathematics. (3rd ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Sari, W.R., & Mutmainah, S. (2018). Increased motivation and results of student math learning through realistic mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 7-13.

    Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80003-2.

    Shahrill, M., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). The connection commonalities in the mathematical content of lesson sequences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012136. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012136.

    Shahrill, M., Putri, R.I.I., Zulkardi, & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Processes involved in solving mathematical problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1952(1), 020019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031981.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7265.215-228

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats