WHY MULTILITERACIES PEDAGOGY MATTERS IN DESIGNING CULTURAL-BASED MATERIALS IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM
Abstract
The current issues on new literacy have been leveraged enormously for decades. Literacy is no longer delineated as the ability to read and write a single text. It has shifted into the multi-literacies within multimodal text based. The multiliteracies pedagogy approach provides the steps for teaching and learning multiliteracies in the English education context. The article aims to describe the nature of leveraging the English language teacher's competence in designing English lessons. The research method is Design and Develop research based on multiliteracies pedagogy approach Analysis. The participants are preservice teachers grade 4 at English Education Department at Faculty of Education and Science in Cirebon Raya. The steps of collecting the data are preparing the themes of multiliteracies; grouping the participants based on their experiences; conceptualizing the local content area of multiliteracies; framing the critical issues in the content area; applying the concept to the social practice with the technology integration, and the last, publishing or presenting the product of the research. Findings indicate that the participants have produced digital cultural-based lesson plans. They also seem to have more practice in developing critical thinking skills by doing collaboration in small groups to create lesson plans critically and creatively. To settle the remarkable points of the study, multiliteracies pedagogy has gradually triggered someone to leverage their competence.
Keywords
References
Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., Hilmi, M. R., & Azeana, D. (2009). What do the highly-rated and accredited LIS programmes inform us about education in digital libraries? Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. https://doi.org/Article
Ahmad, M., Badusah, J., Mansor, A. Z., Karim, A. A., Khalid, F., Daud, M. Y., Din, R., & Zulkefle, D. F. (2016). The application of 21st century ict literacy model among teacher trainees. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3).
ANQEP. (2015). P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. 21st Century Skills.
Ashcroft. (1987). Defusing-empowering-: The What and The Why.
Bachmair, B., & Bazalgette, C. (2007). The European Charter for Media Literacy: Meaning and Potential. Research in Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.80
Bandura, A. (2019). Albert Bandura’s concept of Self-efficacy. 1–7.
Brett, C. (2009). Educational Perspectives on Digital Communications Technologies [1]. 6(3), 281–291.
Broom, C. (2015). Empowering students: Pedagogy that benefits educators and learners. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 14(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173415597142
Brunton, M., & Jeffrey, L. (2014). Identifying factors that influence the learner empowerment of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43(PB), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.10.003
Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. In Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410372154
Can, ?., Durgun, H., & Dalcal?, B. K. (2022). Effect of online communication skills training on effective communication and self-efficacy and self-regulated learning skills of nursing students: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEPR.2022.103371
Cattaneo, L. B., & Chapman, A. R. (2010). The Process of Empowerment: A Model for Use in Research and Practice. American Psychologist, 65(7), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018854
Chai, C. S., Tan, L., Deng, F., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers’ design capacities for web-based 21st century new culture of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3013
Chang, C., Pearman, C., & Farha, N. (2012). Second Language Acquisition : Implications of Web 2 . 0 and Beyond. Critical Questions in Education.
Cheng, E. W. L. (2019). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-018-9598-6
Cheng, M., & Cheng, M. (2016). Student Empowerment and Transformative Quality. Quality in Higher Education, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-666-8_2
Cole, Field, & H. (2010). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: interactive effect on students’ reaction to a management class. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2.
Conference, N. R., & Massey, D. (2018). Fifty Volumes of Research : Literacy Teacher Education Features of Literacy Coursework. 1970–1971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18785325
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. In Framing Languages and Literacies: Socially Situated Views and Perspectives (Issue August 2009). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070895
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Heron-Hruby, A., Wood, K. D., Mraz, M. E., Keefe, E. B., & Copeland, S. R. (2013). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24(3–4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824507
Cresswell, John W.; Poth, C. N. (2016a). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among 5 approach (Fourth Edi). SAGE Publications.
Cresswell, John W.; Poth, C. N. (2016b). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among 5 Approaches. Sage Publication, 778.
Critical Analysis of Literacy Program. (n.d.).
Da?göl, G. D. (2020). Perceived academic motivation and learner empowerment levels of efl students in Turkish context. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.33.7.3
De, S. I., & Suherdi, D. (2019). disruption era. 253(Aes 2018), 439–445.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education (Kappa Delta Pi Lecture). In Americas New York, NY 1002.
Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and Education.
Duhon-Haynes, G. M. (1996). Student Empowerment: Definition, Implication and Strategies for Implementation. Third World Symposium, 8.
Dwa rozdzialy Coperías Aguilar, J. M. i H. (7-21) w monografii E. A. S. (2007). 1. Dealing with intercultural communicative competence in the foreign language classroom, 2. House: What is an intercultural speaker. In Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning by Eva Alcón Soler. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_3.pdf
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Freire, P. (2013). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In The Applied Theatre Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891315-58
Gretter, S., & Yadav, A. (2016). Computational Thinking and Media & Information Literacy: An Integrated Approach to Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0098-4
Gu, Z. (2018). Study of Multiliteracy Pedagogy in College English Teaching. 283(Cesses), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-18.2018.23
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Hamied, F. A. (2012). English in Multicultural and Multilingual Indonesian Education. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English as an international language in Asia: Implication for Language Education (p. 63). Springer.
Heard, J., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking : Definition and Structure CRITICAL THINKING : Definition and Structure. November 2021.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3).
Heron-Hruby, A., Wood, K. D., & Mraz, M. E. (2008). Introduction: Possibilities for using a multiliteracies approach with struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 24(3), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802004084
Husin, W. N. F. W., Arsad, N. M., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through Project Oriented Problem Based Learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching.
Jacobs, G. E. (2006). Fast Times and Digital Literacy: Participation Roles and Portfolio Construction Within Instant Messaging.
Jacobson-lundeberg, V. (2016). Pedagogical Implementation of 21 st Century Skills. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.317.5834.28a
Jacoby, D., Ralph, R., Preston, N., & Coady, Y. (2019). Immersive and collaborative classroom experiences in virtual reality. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_79
Javed, F., & Jacob, F. (2016). Data science and big data analytics at career builder. In Big-Data Analytics and Cloud Computing: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25313-8_6
Jenson, J., & Droumeva, M. (2017). Revisiting the media generation: Youth media use and computational literacy instruction. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017731357
John Dewey. (n.d.). The Teacher as Navigator. In The early works of John Dewey. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://in.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/4917_Simpson__Chapter_5_The_Teacher_as_Navigator.pdf
Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5
Keefe, E. B., & Copeland, S. R. (2013). What is Literacy? The Power of a Definition. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824507
Kellner, D. (2004). Technological Transformation , Multiple Literacies , and the. 1(1), 9–37.
Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Brown, K., Karibo, B., & Park, E. (2016). The power of student empowerment: Measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators. Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.1002880
Kivunja, C. (2014). Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens’ Digital Connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81
Koehler, M.J., Mishra, Punya., and Cain, W. (2013). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). The Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636917
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing Fundamental Principles for Teacher Education Programs and Practices. Eaching and Teacher Education.
Kupiainen, R., Suoranta, J., & Vadén, T. (2007). Fire Next Time: Or Revisioning Higher Education in the Context of Digital Social Creativity. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2007.4.2.128
Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky ’ s Developmental and.
Literacy | UNESCO UIS. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/literacy
Literacy Association, I. (2018). LITERACY LEADERSHIP BRIEF The Power and Promise of Read-Alouds and Independent Reading.
Literacy Education Program Schedule. (2022). 2022.
Literacy in Health and Physical Education. (n.d.). Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/english/literacy/Pages/literacy-in-health-and-physical-education.aspx
Maisa, Musthafa, B., & Suherdi, D. (2020). Preservice-Teachers’ Empowerment through Multiliteracy Pedagogy Approach in the EFL Context during the Covid-19 Pandemic and the New Normal Era. The Asian ESP Journal, 17(7.1), 95–116.
Maisa, Suherdi D, & M. B. (2021). Why Preservice Teacher Empowerment with Five Dimension Matters in Language Pedagogy Context.
Maisa, Suherdi, D., & Musthafa, B. (2020). Charging Personal Growth of Preservice Teachers with 21st Century Career ad Life Skills during the Covid-19 Pandemic and New Era. The Asian ESP Journal, 17(7.2), 60–82.
Mills, K. A. (2006). “We’ve been wastin’’ a whole million watchin’ her doin’ her shoes" situated practice within a pedagogy of multiliteracies.” Australian Educational Researcher, 33(3), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03216840
Mills, K. A. (2007). “Have You Seen Lord of the Rings ?” Power, Pedagogy, and Discourses in a Multiliteracies Classroom . Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 6(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450701454247
Monk, C. (2018). Lost Generation. American Literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199827251-0183
Murray. (2019a). Empowerment in SHE (sustainability in higher education). In Sustaiability in Higher Education.
Murray, J. (2019b). Student Empowerment and Sustainability. Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_365-1
Nichols, J. D. (2006). Empowerment and relationships: A classroom model to enhance student motivation. Learning Environments Research, 9(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9006-8
Nordin, H., & Ariffin, T. F. T. (2016). Validation of a technological pedagogical content knowledge instrument in a Malaysian secondary school context. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2016.13.1.1
Olthouse, J. M. (2013). Multiliteracies Theory and Gifted Education. Gifted Child Today, 36(4), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513497575
Pakravan, M. H., & MacCarty, N. (2020). What motivates behavior change? analyzing user intentions to adopt clean technologies in low-resource settings using the theory of planned behavior. Energies, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/EN13113021
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). P21 Common Core toolkit: A guide to aligning the Common Core State Standards with the Framework for 21st Century Skills. Framework. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.02.038
Professional, O. T., & Handbook, D. P. (2022). LITERACY.
Sakhiyya Z & HIER Agustien. (2018a). Impact of Pre-service Teacher Training: A Case Study of Teacher Education Programme in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 40–56.
Sakhiyya Z & HIER Agustien. (2018b). Reconceptualization of knowledge base in preservice teacher education curiculum: toward EFL Pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 49–56.
Sarosa, S. (2021). The effect of perceived risks and perceived cost on using online learning by high school students. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.164
Sarosa, S. (2022a). The effect of perceived risks and perceived cost on using online learning by high school students. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.12.164
Sarosa, S. (2022b). The Negative Effects of Online Learning | MOSAIC. https://mosaic.ua.edu/2022/04/19/the-negative-effects-of-online-learning/
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Myers, S. A., Turman, P. D., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2008). Learner empowerment and teacher evaluations as functions of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 57(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701840303
Skills, T. P. F. 21St C. (2015). P21 Framework For 21st Century Learning. Framework.
Suherdi, D. (2019). Teaching English in the industry 4.0 and disruption era: Early lessons from the implementation of SMELT I 4.0 DE in a senior high lab school class. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.16418
Suzani, S. M. (2018). Implementing critical pedagogy in EFL contexts: closing the gap between theory and practice. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 9, 116–124. https://jett.labosfor.com/index.php/jett/article/view/329
Tomlinson, M. M. (2013a). Literacy and music in early childhood: Multimodal learning and design. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013502498
Tomlinson, M. M. (2013b). Literacy and Music in Early Childhood : Multimodal Learning and Design. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013502498
Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., Fareed, W., & Mohamed, B. (2013). Squaring Literacy Assessment With Multimodal Design : An Analytic Case for Semiotic Awareness. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13504155
Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Yusuf, W. F. B. M. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: An analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13504155
Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Empowerment Education: Freire’s Ideas Adapted to Health Education. Health Education & Behavior, 15(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500402
Walsh, J., & Ie, J. W. (n.d.). Introduction Language Planning and Socio-Economic Development in Ireland: Towards an Integrated Framework? Debating Language Policies in Canada and Europe.
What, T., Author, W., Source, L. A., Council, N., Url, E. S., & Linked, U. T. C. R. (2016). Language Arts,. 64(2), 142–156.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v10i2.22747
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
PUBLISHER:
ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM, FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION, UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA
JLN SRIJAYA NEGARA BUKIT BESAR PALEMBANG 30137, SUMATERA SELATAN, INDONESIA
EMAIL: jele@fkip.unsri.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.