• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • santuy4d
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • https://perpustakaan.stpreinha.ac.id/mahasiswa/
  • https://www.lml.stpreinha.ac.id/lab/
  • https://cursosvirtuales.icip.edu.pe/nice/
  • slot resmi
    • MATHEMATICS TEACHER’S SELF-EFFICACY OF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE | Bakar | Journal on Mathematics Education

    MATHEMATICS TEACHER’S SELF-EFFICACY OF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE

    Nurul Shahhida Abu Bakar, Siti Mistima Maat, Roslinda Rosli

    Abstract


    This study conducted to determine the mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) based on gender and teaching experience. In this research, 66 mathematics teachers from national secondary schools were chosen as the samples to answer a survey questionnaire containing 71 items with a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, such as mean, percentage, and standard deviation, were employed to analyze the data. T-test was used to gauge the mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and TPACK based on gender, and one-way ANOVA was employed to determine mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and TPACK based on teaching experience. Besides, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between the mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and TPACK. The findings showed no significant difference between genders and the teaching experience of the mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy and TPACK. However, mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and TPACK were strongly associated. In conclusion, whether male or female, for as long as mathematics teachers had been working, they have a positive self-efficacy in initiating technology integration and introducing TPACK. The implication was gender and teaching experience were not a critical factor for mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and TPACK. For future research related to this study, it could introduce other factors, such as academic qualification and technology courses they had attended.


    Keywords


    Self-efficacy; Technology integration; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Mathematics teacher

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self- efficacy beliefs about technology integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670.

    Adalier, A. (2012). Turkish and English language teacher candidates’ perceived computer self-efficacy and attitudes toward computer. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 192–201.

    Alshehri, K. A. (2012). The influence of mathematics teachers’ knowledge in Technology, Pedagogy and Content (TPACK) on their teaching effectiveness in Saudi public schools. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Lawrence-Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Andini, S., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2018). Developing flipbook multimedia: The achievement of informal deductive thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5396.227-238.

    Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728–746. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.362.

    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

    Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836.

    Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Sari, A. A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565.

    Bilici, S. C., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., & Guzey, S. S. (2013). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Efficacy Scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: Construction, validation, and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 37–60.

    Bowers, J. S., & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: A framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journal Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9168-x.

    Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F135910457000100301.

    Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155.

    Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013). A turn toward specifying validity criteria in the measurement of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782616.

    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Second Ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth). Oxon: Routledge.

    Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd. Ed.). United States of America: Sage Publications.

    Cueto, S., León, J., Sorto, M. A., & Miranda, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics achievement of students in Peru. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9735-2.

    Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(3), 10–14.

    Dias, L. B., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct “Just Right?” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615.

    Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., … Meagher, M. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain (Vol. 13, pp. 89–132). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0.

    Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x.

    Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400.

    Forgasz, H. (2006). Factors that encourage or inhibit computer use for secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(1), 77–93.

    Fujita, T. (2018). “That journal has a history”: Overview of the technological tools and theories studied in the International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 2004 - 2018. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 25(4), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme.

    Gavora, P. (2010). Slovak pre-service teacher self-efficacy: Theoretical and research considerations. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 17-30.

    George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (10 ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217532.

    Govender, D. W., & Govender, I. (2009). The relationship between Information and Communications Technology (ICT) integration and teachers’ self -efficacy beliefs about ICT. Education as Change, 13(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823200902943346.

    Gulten, D. C., Yaman, Y., Deringol, Y., & Ozsari, I. (2011). Investigating the relationship between curiosity level and computer self-efficacy beliefs of elementary teachers candidates. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 11–13.

    Halili, S. H., & Suguneswary. (2016). Teacher acceptance of the use of TAM model-based information and communication technology in the teaching of Tamil subjects [in Malay]. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(2), 31–41.

    Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, 2, 1-42.

    Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? Journal of Science and Technology, 17(6), 586–594.

    Hsu, Y., Tsai, J., Chang, H., & Liang, C. (2017). Surveying in-service teachers’ beliefs about game-based learning and perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge of games. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 134–143.

    Irfan Naufal, U., & Amat Sazali, A. H. (2015). Malaysian teachers’ levels of ICT integration and its perceived impact on teaching and learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2015–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.586.

    Kaput, J. J., & Thompson, P. W. (1994). Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 Years in the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/749579.

    Kazu, I. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126–144.

    Keser, H., Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Y?lmaz, R. (2015). TPACK competencies and technology integration self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 14(4), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.65067.

    Kim, S. (2018). Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and beliefs of preservice secondary mathematics teachers: Examining the relationships. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 14(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93179.

    Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.

    Lailiyah, M., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2017). Indonesian EFL teachers’ Self-Efficacy towards Technology Integration (SETI) and their use of technology in EFL teaching. Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(2), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v5n2p344.

    Loong, E. Y. K. (2014). Using the internet in high school mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 108-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1496.108-126.

    Majzub, R. M., & Yusuf, M. (1991). Investigating relationship between self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and learning strategies of UKM undergraduate students. Advanced Educational Technologies, 1, 187–190.

    Mbodila, M., Jones, T., & Muhandji, K. (2013). Integration of ICT in education: Key challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(11), 515–520.

    Meenakshi. (2013). Importance of ICT in education. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 1(4), 3–8.

    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Muhtadi, D., Wahyudin, Kartasasmita, B. G., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). The Integration of technology in teaching mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012020.

    Naziri, F., Rasul, M. S., & Affandi, H. M. (2019). Nominal group technique application on TPACK element requirements for design and technology teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i4/5810.

    Nordin, N., Zakaria, E., Mohamed, N. R. N., & Embi, M. A. (2010). Pedagogical usability of the geometer’s sketchpad (GSP) digital module in the mathematics teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 113–117.

    Oktaviyanthi, R., & Supriani, Y. (2015). Utilizing Microsoft mathematics in teaching and learning calculus. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1902.63-76.

    Özgün-koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2009). Preservice teachers’ emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10–20.

    Philippou, G. N., & Christou, C. (1998). The effects of a preparatory mathematics program in changing prospective teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003030211453.

    Saadati, F., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2014). Utilization of Information and communication technologies in mathematics learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 138-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1498.138-147.

    Sahin, I., Celik, I., Akturk, A. O., & Aydin, M. (2013). Analysis of relationships between technological pedagogical content knowledge and educational internet use. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784714.

    Salani, E. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and technology: Calculator use in mathematics instruction in junior secondary schools in Botswana. European Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.151.

    Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. van, & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers and Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.

    Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2.

    Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248–1265. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.800.

    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X015002004.

    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.

    Talib, N., Yassin, S. F. M., Nasir, M. K. M., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2016). Integrating technological pedagogical and content knowledge in computer programming courses: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 27(1), 1–15.

    Tezci, E. (2011). Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ ICT usage in education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.587116.

    Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543068002202.

    Unsal, S., Korkmaz, F., & Percin, S. (2016). Analysis of mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy levels concerning the teaching process. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 99–107.

    Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456.

    Walker, L. R., & Shepard, M. (2011). Phenomenological investigation of elementary school teachers who successfully integrated instructional technology into the curriculum. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 1(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2011.01.01.02.

    Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414.

    Yau, H. K., Cheng, A. L. F., & Ho, W. M. (2015). Identify the motivational factors to affect the higher education students to learn using technology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 89–100.

    Zakaria, E., & Iksan, Z. (2009). Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 35–39.

    Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C., & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782618.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats