• https://spadav2.unikal.ac.id/lang/paito-hk/
  • Sbotop
  • http://fairplay.uho.ac.id/lapas/sensus/
  • https://theoejwilson.com/
  • https://penkopjurnal.uho.ac.id/cokky/cheat/
  • slot demo
  • iblis merah hack
  • https://prologue.sastra.uniba-bpn.ac.id/js/idslot/
  • alexis toto
  • Robot Merah Hack
  • pusat maxwin
  • santuy4d
  • https://spada.ppg.ung.ac.id/mod/sthai/
  • https://simlinmas.kemendagri.go.id/web/xgacor/
  • https://conference.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/pages/tslot/
  • http://jiseafa.lppm.unand.ac.id/js/demo-slot/
  • http://jiseafa.lppm.unand.ac.id/js/slotraf/
  • turbox500
  • Lapak Cheat
  • Lucky RP
  • https://www.ies.ftk.uinjambi.ac.id/pages/dewa288/
  • https://ett.ftk.uinjambi.ac.id/pages/ligaciputra/
  • https://rechtenstudent.uinkhas.ac.id/pages/scatter/
  • http://elearning.wisnuwardhana.ac.id/mod/santuymax/
  • https://digilib.markandeyabali.ac.id
  • https://elearning.pranataindonesia.ac.id/course/santuy4d/
  • https://digilib.markandeyabali.ac.id/images//scatter-hitam-mahjong/index.html
  • Garudaslot
  • slot online
  • dewa288
  • https://lpm.stikesyarsi-pontianak.ac.id/kgacor/
  • garudaslot
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
    • AN ANALYSIS OF LEARNERS’ SOLUTION STRATEGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF MODELLING TASKS | Reit | Journal on Mathematics Education

    AN ANALYSIS OF LEARNERS’ SOLUTION STRATEGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF MODELLING TASKS

    Xenia-Rosemarie Reit, Marc Schäfer

    Abstract


    It remains a challenge for teachers to integrate modeling tasks in everyday mathematics classes. Many studies have been conducted that show the difficulties faced by teachers.  One of the challenging aspects in this regard is that of assessment. In the present study, a connection between structures of learners’ solution strategies and cognitive considerations is established to develop a practice-oriented instrument to determine and assess the complexity of solution strategies of modeling tasks. In this paper, the selected learners’ strategies’ structure was analyzed in-depth to identify the underlying cognitive structure. The results show that thought operations carried out in parallel complicated a solution strategy.  However, the results also support a purely sequential thought operation approach without weighting parallel thought operations, which corresponds to an intuitive assessment procedure by mathematics teachers. As assessment is a great challenge for many teachers in the context of modeling tasks, this study provides a promising frame of reference for further research in this important domain of assessment and modeling.

    Keywords


    modelling tasks; cognitive structure; solution strategies; mathematics education

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. T. (2014). State of the field review: Assessment and learning. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Education. Oxford, England: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment. https://taloe.up.pt/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/FINALMASTER2July14Bairdetal2014AssessmentandLearning.pdf

    Baumann, M. (2000). Die Funktion des Arbeitsgedächtnisses beim abduktiven Schließen: Experimente zur Verfügbarkeit der mentalen Repräsentation erklärter und nicht erklärter Beobachtungen [The Function of Working Memory in Abductive Reasoning: Experiments on the Availability of Mental Representation of Explained and Unexplained Observations] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:swb:ch1-200100710

    Blum, W., & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical Modelling: Can It Be Taught And Learnt?. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58. https://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/modelling/article/view/1620/1087

    Bourbaki, N. (1961). Die architektur der mathematik I [The architecture of mathematics I]. Physikalische Blätter, 17(4), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/phbl.19610170403

    Breidenbach, W. (1969). Methodik des Mathematikunterrichts in Grund- und Hauptschulen. Band 1 – Rechnen [Methodology of mathematics teaching in primary and lower secondary schools. Volume 1 - arithmetic]. Hannover: Schroedel

    Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Sjuts, J., & Sommer, N. (2004). Komplexität von Denkvorgängen und Formalisierung von Wissen [Complexity of thought processes and formalization of knowledge]. In M. Neubrand (Ed.), Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern - Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 109-138). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80661-1_7

    English, L. (2009). Promoting interdisciplinarity through mathematical modelling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0106-z

    Fernandes, D. (1995). Analyzing four preservice teachers’ knowledge and thoughts through their biographical histories. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Recife, Brazil (Vol. 2, pp. 162–169). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

    Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90052-6

    Jensen, T. H. (2007). Assessing Mathematical Modelling Competency. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 141–148). Chichester: Horwood. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.3.141

    Kaune, C. (2000). Analyse einer TIMSS-Aufgabe mit den Methoden der kognitiven Mathematik [Analysis of a TIMSS task using the methods of cognitive mathematics]. In M. Neubrand (Ed.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht (pp. 330-333). Hildesheim: Franzbecker

    Niss, M. (1993). Assessment of mathematical applications and modelling in mathematics teaching. In J. de Lange, I. Huntley, C. Keitel & M. Niss (Eds.), Innovation in maths education by modelling and applications (pp. 41-51). Chichester: Horwood.

    Reit, X.-R. (2016). Denkstruturanalyse als Instrument zur Bestimmung der Schwierigkeit von Modellierunsgaufgaben [Thought structure analysis as instrument for assessing the complexity of modelling tasks]. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13189-0

    Reit, X.-R., & Ludwig, M. (2015a). An Approach to Theory Based Modelling Tasks. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut, Mathematical Modelling in Education Research and Practice (pp. 81-91). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18272-8_6

    Reit, X.-R., & Ludwig, M. (2015b). Thought structures as an instrument to determine the degree of difficulty of modelling tasks. In N. Vondrova, & J. Novotna, Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Charles University of Prague.

    Rivera, S. A. (2018). Teachers and mathematical modeling: What are the challenges? In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), K-12 STEM education: Breakthroughs in research and practice (Vol 1, pp. 216-236). Hershey: PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3832-5.ch011

    Schmidt, B. (2010). Modellieren in der Schulpraxis: Beweggründe und Hindernisse aus Lehrersicht [Modeling in school practice: motivations and obstacles from the teacher's perspective]. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.

    Shanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2020). T/E design based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8

    Spandaw, J., & Zwaneveld, B. (2010). Modelling in mathematics’ teachers’ professional development. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Azarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 6) - Working Group 11. Lyon, France (pp. 2076-2085). Lyon: National Institute of Pedagogical Research.

    Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

    Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (1993). Developing metacognition through peer and self assessment. In T. Breiteig, I. Huntley & G. Kaiser-Messmer (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Context (pp. 228-240). Chichester: Horwood.

    Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2002). Assessing children's mathematical thinking in practical modelling activities. Teaching Mathematical Applications 21(4), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/21.4.145

    Walzebug, A. (2014). Is there a language-based social disadvantage in solving mathematical items? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.03.002

    Warwick, J. (2007). Some reflections on the teaching of mathematical modeling. The Mathematics Educator, 17(1), 32-41. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/tme/article/view/1910/1815

    Wilson, M. C., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and developments. In G. C. Leder, E. Phekonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3

    Winter, H., & Ziegler, T. (1969). Neue Mathematik: Lehrerheft [New Mathematics: Teacher's Book]. Hannover: Schroedel.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11345.501-512

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats