.png)
THE MATHEMATICAL ARGUMENTATION ABILITY AND ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHER
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H., Blindern, P. O., Duit, R., Treagust, D., Givry, D., … Driver, R. (2006). An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic ... Cognition, 43(2), 1086–1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.002
Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551
Cross, D. I. (2009). Creating Optimal Mathematics Learning Environments: Combining Argumentation and Writing to Enhance Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905–930.
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2008). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
Hendriana, H., Hidayat, W., & Ristiana, M. G. (2018). Student teachers’ mathematical questioning and courage in metaphorical thinking learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 12019.
Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2017). Metaphorical Thinking Learning and Junior High School Teachers’ Mathematical Questioning Ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3614.55-64
Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2017). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0816-6
Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15–28.
Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Open Ended. Jurnal JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109–118.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving Students’ Creative Mathematical Reasoning Ability Students through Adversity Quotient and Argument Driven Inquiry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 12005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8
Johar, R., & Yusniarti, S. (2018). the Analysis of Proportional Reasoning Problem in the Indonesian Mathematics Textbook for the Junior. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68.
Leonard, L., & Amanah, N. (2014). Pengaruh adversity quotient (AQ) dan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 55–64.
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM, 49, 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.
MZ, Z. A., Risnawati, Kurniati, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning (Quantitative Study on Students Boarding School in Pekanbaru). International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 169–176.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.
Panasuk, R. M., & Lewis, S. (2012). Constructivism: Constructing meaning or making sense. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(20), 1–11.
Pangma, R., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Causal factors influencing adversity quotient of twelfth grade and third-year vocational students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 466–470.
Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic problem among student teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26.
Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67–78.
Saleh, M., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the Reasoning Ability of Elementary School Student Through the Indonesian Realistic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41–54.
Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity, 4(2), 120–139.
Sundayana, R., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Using ASSURE learning design to develop students’ mathematical communication ability. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 245–249.
Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2016). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139
p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats