• https://theoejwilson.com/
  • mariatogel
  • santuy4d
  • garuda slot
  • garudaslot
  • https://edujournals.net/
  • nadimtogel
  • https://mitrasehatjurnal.com/
  • slot gacor hari ini
  • g200m
  • 55kbet
  • slot gacor
  • garudaslot
  • link slot gacor
    • THE MATHEMATICAL ARGUMENTATION ABILITY AND ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHER | Hidayat | Journal on Mathematics Education

    THE MATHEMATICAL ARGUMENTATION ABILITY AND ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHER

    Wahyu Hidayat, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Sufyani Prabawanto

    Abstract


    The Mathematical argumentation has been studied before, but no research has a focus on mathematical argumentation and adversity quotient of the pre-service mathematics teacher. This study is experimental research that aims to know and examine in depth about the influence of AQ of pre-service mathematics teacher toward the achievement of mathematical argument ability. The population of this study is the pre-service mathematics teacher in Cimahi City, West Java, Indonesia; while the sample is 60 pre-service mathematics teachers selected purposively. The instruments of this study are tests and non-tests. They are based on the assessment of good characteristics towards students' mathematical argumentation abilities, while the non-test instrument is based on the assessment of good characteristics towards AQ. The results of this research show that: (1) AQ gives positive influence to the development of mathematical argumentation ability of pre-service mathematics teacher with the influence of 60.2%, while the rest of it (39.8%) is influenced by other factors outside AQ; (2) The ability of mathematical argumentation of pre-service mathematics teacher is more developed on AQ of Climber type; (3) Students with the Quitter AQ type still tend to have less ability of mathematical argumentation.

    Keywords


    Adversity Quotient; Mathematical Argumentation

    Full Text:

    PDF

    References


    Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H., Blindern, P. O., Duit, R., Treagust, D., Givry, D., … Driver, R. (2006). An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic ... Cognition, 43(2), 1086–1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea

    Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.002

    Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551

    Cross, D. I. (2009). Creating Optimal Mathematics Learning Environments: Combining Argumentation and Writing to Enhance Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905–930.

    Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2008). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

    Hendriana, H., Hidayat, W., & Ristiana, M. G. (2018). Student teachers’ mathematical questioning and courage in metaphorical thinking learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 12019.

    Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2017). Metaphorical Thinking Learning and Junior High School Teachers’ Mathematical Questioning Ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3614.55-64

    Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2017). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0816-6

    Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15–28.

    Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Open Ended. Jurnal JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109–118.

    Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving Students’ Creative Mathematical Reasoning Ability Students through Adversity Quotient and Argument Driven Inquiry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 12005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005

    Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8

    Johar, R., & Yusniarti, S. (2018). the Analysis of Proportional Reasoning Problem in the Indonesian Mathematics Textbook for the Junior. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68.

    Leonard, L., & Amanah, N. (2014). Pengaruh adversity quotient (AQ) dan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 55–64.

    Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM, 49, 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3

    Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.

    MZ, Z. A., Risnawati, Kurniati, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning (Quantitative Study on Students Boarding School in Pekanbaru). International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 169–176.

    Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

    Panasuk, R. M., & Lewis, S. (2012). Constructivism: Constructing meaning or making sense. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(20), 1–11.

    Pangma, R., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Causal factors influencing adversity quotient of twelfth grade and third-year vocational students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 466–470.

    Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic problem among student teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26.

    Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67–78.

    Saleh, M., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the Reasoning Ability of Elementary School Student Through the Indonesian Realistic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41–54.

    Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity, 4(2), 120–139.

    Sundayana, R., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Using ASSURE learning design to develop students’ mathematical communication ability. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 245–249.

    Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2016). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63–74.




    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248

    Refbacks

    • There are currently no refbacks.




    Journal on Mathematics Education
    Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
    Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
    Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
    Palembang - 30139
    email: jme@unsri.ac.id
    p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

    Creative Commons License
    Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


    View My Stats