Guillermo Baluyot Bonghanoy, Alben P. Sagpang, Ronnie A. Alejan Jr., Louie Resti Rellon


This paper was an attempt to redesign the current professional development training for Mathematics teachers in the Philippines. Mathematics teachers claimed that most training and seminars they attended ignored their local work context; was routinely and was hardly applicable to their classroom milieu. By utilizing the transformative professional development training, the teachers identified the classroom issues that had confronted them; restructured their useful pedagogical ideas and instructional plans and materials; implemented these in their classrooms; and shared their reflections on the new teaching experiences. Qualitative data were gathered from focus group discussions and key informant interviews. University researchers (3), secondary Mathematics teachers (28), and students (250) from four rural public schools in the Hamiguitan Range participated. The teachers and students revealed that their lack of self and environmental understanding were the prevalent issues that led to critical behavior in Mathematical cognition and learning. By applying the transformative education in the classroom, promising results like better teacher performance, improved students' interest, and maximized student participation were evident. This transformative professional development training adequately responded to the teachers' work needs and was recommended to other areas of learning.


Pedagogical Ideas; Student Interest; Teacher Professional Development; Transformative Learning; Transformative Mathematics Education

Full Text:



Azmidar, A., Darhim, D., & Dahlan, J.A. (2017). Enhancing students’ interest through mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012072.

Baldwin, R.G. (1996). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In D. Finnegan, D. Webster, & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75-87.

Boyd, R.D., & Meyers, J.G. (1988). Transformative education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7(4), 261–284.

Brookfield, S. (2005). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Brophy, J. (2000). Educational Practices Series 1. Retrieved from: .

Colomeischi, A.A., & Colomeischi, T. (2015). The students ‘emotional life and their attitude toward mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 744-750.

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.

Creswell, J.W., & Garrett, A.L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 321-333.

Crowther, F., Kaagen, S.S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Ekawati, R., & Lin, F.L. (2014). Designing teacher professional development for mathematics teaching with variation theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 127-137.

Foley, B.J., & Reveles, J.M. (2014). Pedagogy for the connected science classroom: Computer supported collaborative science and the next generation science standards. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 401-418.

Frenzel, A.C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H.M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537.

Ganzer, T. (2000). Ambitious visions of professional development for teachers. National Association for Secondary School Principals, 84(618), 6-12.

García-Santillán, A., Escalera-Chávez, M.E., Moreno-García, E., Santana-Villegas, J.D.C. (2016). Factors that explain student anxiety toward mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 361-372.

Heinze, A., Reiss, K., & Franziska, R. (2005). Mathematics achievement and interest in mathematics from a differential perspective. Zentralblatt füur Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(3), 212-220.

Huetti, K.J. (2016). The relationship between poverty and student achievement. Culminating Projects in Teacher Development, Paper 16. Minnesota: St. Cloud University.

Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: what really matters?. British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 731-748.

Khayati, S., & Payan, A. (2014). Effective factors increasing the students’ interest in mathematics in the opinion of mathematic teachers of Zahedan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 8(9), 3069-3077.

Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2013). Mathematics interest and achievement: What role do perceived parent and teacher support play? A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 207-231.

Lomibao, L.S. (2016). Enhancing mathematics teachers’ quality through Lesson Study. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1590.

Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S.M. (2015). ELPSA as a lesson design framework. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77-92.

Mata, M.D.L., Monteiro, V., & Peixoto, F. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child Development Research, 2012, 876028.

Mizell, H. (2010). Why professional development matters. Oxford: Learning Forward.

Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Chrostowski, S.J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Mumu, J., Prahmana, R.C.I., & Tanujaya, B. (2018). Construction and reconstruction concept in mathematics instruction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012011.

Nyman, R. (2017). Interest and engagement: Perspectives on mathematics in the classroom. Dissertation. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. Available at

Palmer, P.L. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Prahmana, R.C.I., & Suwasti, P. (2014). Local instruction theory on division in Mathematics GASING: The case of rural area’s student in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 17-26.

Putri, R.I.I., Dolk, M., & Zulkardi. (2015). Professional Development of PMRI Teachers for Introducing Social Norms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 11-19.

Sagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tahir, S., & Thien, L.M. (2013). Southeast Asia regional standards for mathematics teachers (SEARS-MT): Setting the bar for the teachers. Penang: SEAMEO RECSAM.

Taylor, P.C. (2008). Multi-paradigmatic research design spaces for cultural studies researchers embodying postcolonial theorizing. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4(3), 881-889.

Taylor, P.C., & Medina, M.N.D. (2013). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to multiparadigmatic. Journal for Meaning-Centered Education, 1(1). Available at

Taylor, P.C., Taylor, E.L., & Luitel, B.C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 373-387). Dordrecht: Springer.

Trezise, K., & Reeve, R.A. (2018). Patterns of anxiety in algebraic problem solving: A three-step latent variable analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 78-91.

Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

Watt, H.M., Carmichael, C., & Callingham, R. (2017). Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education. School Psychology International, 38(2), 166-183.

Wenglinsky, H. (2001). Teacher classroom practices and student performance: How schools can make a difference. Princeton: Educational Testing Services, Statistics and Research Division.

Wentzel, K.R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287-301.

Willis, S.L., Tennstedt, S.L., Marsiske, M., Ball, K., Elias, J., Koepke, K. M., ... & Wright, E. (2006). Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA, 296(23), 2805-2814.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal on Mathematics Education
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar
Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar
Palembang - 30139

p-ISSN: 2087-8885 | e-ISSN: 2407-0610

Creative Commons License
Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats